Sunday, November 15, 2009

Bull Lurcher

I am just realizing how much more to working dogs there are beyond the borders of the US.

Google "bull lurcher" - nearly all of them resemble Maisy in some way. Fascinating.

for your comparison - click here.



The 'sighthound build'

Tug



As you can clearly see - Maisy is a huge fan of the tug game. She will tug until you quit with sore arms and numb fingers.
Tug has been the only real outlet that allows me to clearly communicate with her. She was so freaking mouthy when we first adopted her, she was over-the-top possessive, she'd hoard the toy she wanted to tug with once she won, she would bark for your attention and participation and had NO personal boundaries. Our energies were at odds.

To date we can safely place our hands near her mouth to get her to release the toy. She will not bite our hands now. Clearly communicated by playing tug.
We can now expect her to reengage us each and every time we 'let her win' a tug game.
She brings it back every time, until we quit.
She no longer barks to engage, but rather brings us the toy, or we engage her.
Our energies are united, working together.
And I need to feel like we are united! This dog frustrates the living crap out of me!

The beauty of this: I don't even have to speak to clearly communicate using the game of tug.

Even if you do not believe in, could never imagine, or do not prescribe to Natural Dog Training - watch this clip:


Not a single word is spoken, no command is given. And yet - this dog is learning so much about this human. This human is learning a great deal about this dog. This dog - like so many rescue dogs - has no quick fix, it's all live and learn because we were not there to bring this dog up from puppydom. We face their future, however challenging it might be, unaware of the past.
It's a concept I truly believe works in Natural Dog Training. You harness the soul of the dog - the basis of your dog's energy revolves around you by creating a relationship with your dog based on trust... based on allowing the dog to be exactly what it is... emotionally content and connected to you. Clearly communicated. No frustrating, emotional barriers of miscommunication. Energy speaks for itself. Energies united.

So - why allow tug? The trainer we met with a month ago said she never plays tug, she only plays fetch. I understand why she hesitates - dogs have big, sharp, sometimes unpredictable teeth. I just think fetch leaves a lot to be desired, so I choose tug over fetch. And - prominent figures in the positive reinforcement training camps are saying tug is a great game!

So. We tug. We just don't call it war.


(a great place to buy fleece tugs for a great cause!)

Hiking.

It was a beautiful day (well, not quite, but beautiful for me = quiet, secluded, foggy, 50+ degrees) and we took advantage with a hike. More fun to follow...

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Nubs



Happy Veterans Day!

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

me & hound, circa 1980 somethin..



Woodsie. The best damn find in a "free box o'puppies" I ever had. Until he ran away.
I've learned a lot since then.

I think, though no one can confirm this for me, that Woodsie was a beagle/rottie mix.

Worst vs Best Matches!

Something fun, I took this breed match up test answering the opposite of what is actually true of me and my situation...

My worst matches are Anatolian Shepherd (or mix) and Black Russian Terrier (0r mix). So, never ever these dogs or a mix thereof.

I never took the dogtime breed match up before and tried it with honest answers.

My best matches are Boxer/mix (wha..?) and Standard Schnauzer/mix
According to these criteria (based on my actual, truthful answers)

Key features [I] should look for in a dog

  • Possible puppy person: Puppies take a lot of patience and it's often hard to predict what a puppy's personality will be like as an adult. We suggest you consider adult dogs.
  • Friendly enough: You don't need to be everyone's friend so your dog doesn't need to be either. Look for reasonably friendly dogs.
  • Close quarters: Your neighbors are nearby, so look for dogs that don't bark often.
  • Benevolent leader: You're good at setting boundaries but can be flexible as the situation demands, which suggests you can train dogs who thrive on consistent guidance as well as more forgiving dogs. (Though we can't promise that's true!).
  • Good with little kids: Look for a puppy, or dog, who's likely to be tolerant of unpredictable behavior. Older, mellower dogs are often good matches for families with small children. Look for kid-friendly dogs.
  • Hands-free walker: Since you want to walk off-leash, you'd do best with a dog who's less likely to dash off after an interesting scent or intriguing rustle. Look for dogs with low predatory tendencies and low wanderlust.
  • Busy but sane: If that describes your home life, you'd pair up well with most dogs, though a highly sensitive one may be unhappy if life gets so busy it becomes crazy.

In searching for the right dog, we encourage you to look beyond a breed to consider the dog himself. Personality is the most important indicator of what it will be like to live with a dog, and a mutt has it in spades. (love it!)



Interesting...

What about you?

The Proverbial Farm

You know, that farm. Or that home. Or that family.

The one the craigslist ad always asks for "dog seeks home with family who is at home with him all the time"... "dog requires much more time that we can give"... "dog cannot live with children"... "dog chases the cat"... "I'm expecting kid #3 and just picked up this 2 month old puppy and just found out I can't keep it"... "dog needs a farm and room to run"

That farm (check out Pet Connection's blog).

That ideal situation that people whip up in their heads when their dog is exhibiting an issue that they can't, or won't deal with.

I know time is an issue... I'm a part time graduate student and I work full time. I'm a full time wife and have to keep a house from falling apart with three full time dogs. I know time is an issue!
And money for training/training materials/etc. I know money is an issue.. my husband is an independent contractor who is regularly laid off and, as a student, I'm unconditionally in debt!

So, then what? Is it attention and dedication to tending to the issue before it even becomes a 'trip to the farm'?
Because I gotta tell ya... Maisy ain't no picnic! She pulls, she kills small animals, she doesn't focus/listen, she's incredibly mouthy, she's loud, she can't greet other dogs, she's probably aggressive though I don't want to succumb to that term just yet. And yet, she is staying. We are trying. There isn't a farm in her near future (unless we move there with her). And we're only going on month two with her!
And Kitsu isn't easy... he is still quite fearful of new people. And we're two years into this one.
And Tsuki isn't a walk in the park either! She's minesy and very 'soft' in temperament.

I don't even know how to finish my thought here - except, if you want a dog, why don't you want the responsibility of what that entails? Because stuffed animals are just as cute, and don't require time and training. And I need to stop reading craigslist pet posts.

Monday, November 9, 2009

the purpose of an uncategorized dog

nose to the ground.
uproot some leaves.
dig in the dirt.
chase the mouse.
focus. focus. focus.
lick the hand that feeds.
snuggle.
sit.
shake.
eat.
sleep.

the life of one dog of unknown origin is pretty simple. live, sniff, dig, bark, eat, love, play, sleep. does she know she looks different from the 'pure' dogs she lives with? does she know she resembles a dozen other 'pure' breeds? does she care? does it matter?



I think I'm almost ashamed to say that I never really understood the purpose of a dog until I met Maisy... I think subliminally I've always categorized, prioritized, looked for the reason and classification - and never saw the forest for the trees so to speak. I've always told people looking for a dog "find a breed that matches your lifestyle" or "take an online breed selector test" or "find a breed rescue".

Poppycock. I've seen the light. I have a dog now that challenges me in more ways than one.. but mostly its a challenge to reconfigure what I thought I knew.
From now on, I think type is a better word. Breed schmeed.

Find a dog. Find a type of dog that works for or with you and your expectations. Find a pair of eyes (or one eye, or no eyes, or blind eyes) that speak to you, that say "I am your dog"... don't limit yourself by breed alone.

That's the beauty of the shelter adoption. The dog picks you, without caring who it's mamma was :)

the 'pack' that plays together...

stays together? makes lots of noise? tears up the living room? sleeps more?









poses together?

Ear Injury



Maisy came to us with some small scars on the inner flap on her floppy ears. One ear healed, the other keeps reopening.

Though I have not yet actually seen it - I believe a certain cream colored inu is at fault, as she has a history of grabbing at floppy ears of the dogs she plays/lives with.

Maisy needs something to help her ear to heal... any suggestions?

Monday Mornin' AW!

Sunday, November 8, 2009

LI Pet Cemetary

I lit a candle tonight, and then hugged my dogs. What the frick is wrong with people?

Local news coverage (and video, with some slightly disturbing images)
And from Newsday:

An official said at least 20 carcasses were dug up Saturday from the backyard of a Selden woman who was charged with animal cruelty after her pets were seized by the SPCA.

In an eerie scene, SPCA detectives working in a floodlit yard last night dug up one reeking black plastic garbage bag after another, the contents unrecognizable. At times, the smell was overpowering... Of one carcass that was found, Gross said, "There is suspected foul play with this animal." He encouraged anyone with information to call the SPCA at 631-382-7722 and said calls would be kept confidential.

Sharon McDonough, 43, was arrested Saturday and charged with a misdemeanor count of animal cruelty after five dogs were found in the house Thursday in feces, housed in small cages with no food or water, Gross said. A cat, bird and hamster were also taken from the house, Gross said.

McDonough lives in the home with her seven children, who range in age from 18 months to 21, neighbors said.

Authorities went to the home after complaints from neighbors and the animal rescue group Rescue Ink.

Prosecutors were investigating allegations that neighborhood pets were buried in McDonough's backyard, Suffolk district attorney spokesman Bob Clifford said Friday. SPCA investigators obtained a search warrant to dig.

It was unclear last night whether the SPCA would continue to dig in the yard...

Hunting.

Maisy is a machine. She's an all around useful hunting dog (which means, perhaps I should become a hunter. A vegetarian hunter? It's for the dogs..)

To date, without any training from me, Maisy has:
-Treed countless numbers of squirrels
-Treed & subsequently bayed a raccoon and bayed a cat (note: she did not go for the cat in a 'catch', just kept it at bay by barking)
-Flushed a roughed grouse (our state game bird, at the state park, I have witnesses!) though I have no doubt that she would have tried to catch if she were off leash and if the bird didn't then fly into a tree.
-Caught a mouse, a very small squirrel, and a bird. That I know of, anyway. And she only tried to devour the squirrel.
- Sniffed out and ate an egg of some sort of ground nesting bird in the thicket near the lake.
- She hasn't yet retrieved any game, though she does with toys... I wonder if she would?

Is it the combination that makes dogs a "lurcher"? A "cur"? What makes her naturally respond to this 'game' the way she does?

It's amazing when you think about it - here's this young supposed mixed breed dog of unknown origin, found in the shelter, chosen by chance, following her natural instincts. She is a hunting dog. I think this is also what makes her 'difficult' to 'mold' in suburban life. It's not natural to her.


Proud Maisy :)

What can I do to help her on? Harness these instincts? Translate them into the every day?

Saturday, November 7, 2009

5 years.

It's Wayne P's 5th year as CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. Woo.

Is it something to celebrate? Are we a more humane nation thanks to Wayne's fund raising and 'american idol' efforts?

Or are we losing sight of the focus, of the responsibility of the individual pet owner and the individual pet's lifetime welfare? Are we making laws to take away animal rights or protect and preserve them?

What will the next 5 years bring?

For a better understanding of skepticism and realism, read Nathan Winograd's post (graphic images) and Yes Biscuit's coverage of the Memphis tragedies.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

BIG THANKS!

A huge shout of thanks to Kristin for choosing cute fleece fabric and constructing a 'snuggie' for Ms. Maisy!




The lessfur wonder will be much warmer now!


....and a super big thank you to Pam @ Bark & Giggle for taking a gamble using her skill & imagination to make a sighthound-appropriate harness for Ms. Maisy:



Thank you both so much!

Time & Trust, and how it's all relative

It will be about 2 years since we welcomed Mr. Kitsune into our hearts and lives at the end of this month, which is also when he turns another year older.



Kitsune, in retrospect, is probably our greatest "achievement" or at least source of affirmation in rescue possibilities.

He came to us at just about a year old, under socialized, abandoned by his first family for "lackoftimebabyonthewayneedsmorethanwecangive" to a Philadelphia based rescue just starting out. She had her hands full in a 2 bedroom house with a decent sized fenced in yard. It looked like she was fostering about 4 or 5 dogs, and had two mastiff/rottie mixes of her own. Needless to say, this was a rescue that didn't have the man power, time, or funding to help the dog work through issues prior to adoption.
She took a chance on us, too. She wasn't able to do a home visit because we lived 2.5 hrs away from her rescue base, and she had no volunteers. But we had another shiba and good references. And Kitsune (then called "Trotter") did not take to us right away like some fairy tale rescue story. In fact, he growled at us, barked at us, hid behind the coffee table from us.
Still - he took to Tsuki straight away, we signed the papers, and stuck a leash on him hoping to get him at least into the carrier in the car without him running away from us! Success. Back on the turnpike. Home. A shiba scared shitless in a new home with new people looking at him, touching him.

I'd say within 24 hours, he was already accepting of my husband. Luckily, Kitsune wasn't a rescue that had been physically abused - he wasn't fearful of us in that regard - we were just invaders in his comfort zone. John helped comfort him... gave him food and held him that night, talked to him, let him recognize the word that was now his name.
He took to me within a few days, as I was only working part time and spent a great deal of the day with him, feeding and walking. Playing. He watched how I was with Tsuki and he gained courage to approach me like she did, still an arms length if I engaged him, but came close on his terms. How like a shiba...



But now to acclimate him to life outside his general comfort zone. I think we safely assumed his former people hadn't taken him out of his house/yard very often because everything scared him... the gate, the sidewalk, snow, rain, garbage cans, cars, people, gravel. This is why you socialize your dog, to avoid this painfully long, grueling process of adult acclimation! But we carried on and he slowly responded to John's soft but firm voice beckoning him past the trash cans, onto the snow, beyond the gate. He began to recognized that hot dogs meant outside and that was an acceptable trade. Kitsune loves food.



Then there was the fight with a male foster shiba. Then there was the doubt, the tetanus shot, the unpreparedness, the questions, the lessons, the interview with the ignorant 'behaviorist' and the understanding we gained about our dog and what we let happen to him by inappropriately managing the new male (foster). We became better fosters because of this lesson.

Kitsune has taught us a great deal. About trust, and how it supersedes love. About patience, and how it conquers fear. About ignorance, adjustment and judgment. About affection, and how you cannot blanket-statement-define its subtleties. About companionship, and partnership. About time & sequencing & reflection, and how time is relative to all things.



So, now here we are 2 years later with our "bubble boy". All he still wants is to stay in the house while the rest of us go outside for walks, but he reluctantly joins us in a far less fearful demeanor than he used to. He walks by garbage cans like they've always been friends. He welcomes all dogs - foster and non - with management and proper judgment and adjustment. He may never cheerfully approach people, but he's learned to trust our judgment about who comes close and who stays far enough away to remain comfortable.
He trusts us, and we love him - forever.


Doppelganger

Check out Mango, today's adoptable 'puppy'!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Sisters don't shake hands! Sisters gotta...

Volunteerism, by Mutts



Monday, November 2, 2009

Off-leash Offenders

Beware. That's all I have to say. I am pissed and I'm not going to take it anymore.

I am one person who is responsibly managing three dogs, on leash, untangled, with filled poop bags in hand.

You are one lazy person with one roaming, off leash dog. Half the time, I can't even see you... all I see is your dog running full force toward me. Hackles raised. Head down, tail stiff.
- - - - - - - - - - -

Let's break down my equation of three. Sometimes, in the ideal situation, I have my husband to walk with me. A majority of the time, its the non ideal time crunch, just one me & my poop bags & three dogs. One dog is reliably friendly and doesn't bark. One dog is mostly friendly but will growl. One dog is in training (remember, I'm responsible), in a Halti, barking her head off and may not inhibit a bite when approached in this manner by your dog.

I can promise you a few things. I can guarentee you that you will see us walking twice a day, every day, in all weather. I can promise you that part of my responsibility is defending my three dogs. I promise that I will yell at your dog. If he doesn't get the hint, I will smack at your dog with my hand. And, if it came to it, I would kick your dog. I have to. I literally have my hands tied to my responsibility. Please don't let it come to that... I don't want to yell at, smack or kick your dog. Truly, I don't.
Hell, most of the time, if in that ideal my husband is with me, he'll try to retrieve your dog to see if the tags help us locate you. Cars do not guarantee your dog's safety like you can. Be responsible, damn it.

I'm doing part of my responsibility to research what I can do to repeat offenders. We have leash ordinances. I will help enforce them.

You have ONE responsibility, to keep your dog in your yard so the rest of us with THREE ON LEASH dogs can confidently remain safe on our walks. Please.

Jonathan Safran Foer's Modest Proposal

From Wall Street Journal:

...Dogs are wonderful, and in many ways unique. But they are remarkably unremarkable in their intellectual and experiential capacities. Pigs are every bit as intelligent and feeling, by any sensible definition of the words. They can't hop into the back of a Volvo, but they can fetch, run and play, be mischievous and reciprocate affection. So why don't they get to curl up by the fire? Why can't they at least be spared being tossed on the fire? Our taboo against dog eating says something about dogs and a great deal about us.

The French, who love their dogs, sometimes eat their horses.

The Spanish, who love their horses, sometimes eat their cows.

The Indians, who love their cows, sometimes eat their dogs.

While written in a much different context, George Orwell's words (from "Animal Farm") apply here: "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

So who's right? What might be the reasons to exclude canine from the menu? The selective carnivore suggests:

Don't eat companion animals. But dogs aren't kept as companions in all of the places they are eaten. And what about our petless neighbors? Would we have any right to object if they had dog for dinner?

OK, then: Don't eat animals with significant mental capacities. If by "significant mental capacities" we mean what a dog has, then good for the dog. But such a definition would also include the pig, cow and chicken. And it would exclude severely impaired humans.

Then: It's for good reason that the eternal taboos—don't fiddle with your crap, kiss your sister, or eat your companions—are taboo. Evolutionarily speaking, those things are bad for us. But dog eating isn't a taboo in many places, and it isn't in any way bad for us. Properly cooked, dog meat poses no greater health risks than any other meat.

...

Of course, something having been done just about everywhere is no kind of justification for doing it now. But unlike all farmed meat, which requires the creation and maintenance of animals, dogs are practically begging to be eaten. Three to four million dogs and cats are euthanized annually. The simple disposal of these euthanized dogs is an enormous ecological and economic problem. But eating those strays, those runaways, those not-quite-cute-enough-to-take and not-quite-well-behaved-enough-to-keep dogs would be killing a flock of birds with one stone and eating it, too.

In a sense it's what we're doing already. Rendering—the conversion of animal protein unfit for human consumption into food for livestock and pets—allows processing plants to transform useless dead dogs into productive members of the food chain. In America, millions of dogs and cats euthanized in animal shelters every year become the food for our food. So let's just eliminate this inefficient and bizarre middle step.

This need not challenge our civility. We won't make them suffer any more than necessary. While it's widely believed that adrenaline makes dog meat taste better—hence the traditional methods of slaughter: hanging, boiling alive, beating to death—we can all agree that if we're going to eat them, we should kill them quickly and painlessly, right? For example, the traditional Hawaiian means of holding the dog's nose shut—in order to conserve blood—must be regarded (socially if not legally) as a no-no. Perhaps we could include dogs under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. That doesn't say anything about how they're treated during their lives, and isn't subject to any meaningful oversight or enforcement, but surely we can rely on the industry to "self-regulate," as we do with other eaten animals.

...Food is not rational. Food is culture, habit, craving and identity. Responding to factory farming calls for a capacity to care that dwells beyond information. We know what we see on undercover videos of factory farms and slaughterhouses is wrong. (There are those who will defend a system that allows for occasional animal cruelty, but no one defends the cruelty, itself.) And despite it being entirely reasonable, the case for eating dogs is likely repulsive to just about every reader of this paper. The instinct comes before our reason, and is more important.

—Jonathan Safran Foer is the author of the novels "Everything is Illuminated" and "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close." His new book, "Eating Animals," a work of nonfiction, comes out next week.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Of Halti's and Time Management

Let me tell you about our new training device, and then perhaps it will shed light on the situation.

Maisy was adopted almost two months ago and since has been very difficult for me to adjust to. She is a totally new "breed" of dog for us - one that does not find physical and mental stimulation from the same activity and one that is a continuous challenge regardless of what we try to consistently do. She is smart as a whip(pet?) but that proves to be monstrously challenging in training, as she rapidly learns to manipulate devices to continue her bad habits.

With the Easy Walk, she learned that if she walked slightly sideways, she could still get her pull on. We tried circling, switching, stopping. If we were to accomplish peaceful loose leash walking, we needed something more.

We tried the Gentle Leader, and with some positive associations, she did let us put it on her, adjust it, and attempt to walk. I think because it is generally unnatural (as is most of the human world to a dog) and probably uncomfortable, while she would walk with it on, she chewed through a mouth strap in a single training session.

Enter the Halti. It's fit has less adjustability overall than the Gentle Leader, but it has more control for the handler and less room for chew with a proper fit (for her muzzle shape and in our experience, anyway). She did a lot less thrashing and I had an easier time easing her into the direction I wanted to look. I felt more comfortable with the Halti, there is more guided control over her movements, less risk of vertebral damage.



Of course, this is a huge work in progress. It takes conscious consistency on my and my husband's part. It takes a lot of Natural Balance Turkey Roll, and a lot of patience.

Maisy has three major issues to tackle:
1. Leash reactivity
2. Mental frustration
3. Lack of focus

Essentially, she is a hunter living in suburbia with natural frustrations from lack of hunting.

The Halti can help us guide her head into focus and hopefully with leash reactivity as it also acts as a sort of loose muzzle, hopefully allowing us to have meet and greets with acceptable dogs in the near future when focus improves.

A 50ft leash in a wooded area filled with rodents and birds help her mental frustration, which than aids in the endless physical exertion we are trying to give her with walks, runs, play, fetch..

We are also playing with a flirt pole, though outside she is more focused on what could be lurking in the trees than the goose toy whipping around the air around her...


Now, the time management.
Generally, I update this blog on breaks or at home. My at home computer time has diminished to a *zero* percent usage, and work breaks are becoming less and less (which is good, I'm grateful for my job!). So, while blog updates may diminish, know we are still here, working... waiting... and will hopefully update when time allows.

Purity Priority

Read Pet Connection's AKC Commentary here.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Bid for MSIR!

The Mid West Shiba Inu Rescue is having its auction right now! Go here to start bidding!
(but not the tan shiba shirt, I like the shirt, I want the shirt :)


Ball Review

Steve's Fetchy Ball Review - check it out! And trust the expert ;)

Monday, October 26, 2009

Leapin' Lurcher

Fall

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Kiss my big green ass.

Do you consider yourself a "green" person? Y'know, using canvas shopping bags, compact flourescent lightbulbs, etc.? Well apparently, that's not good enough! Those actions are "largely cosmetic," New Zealand architecture professor Brenda Vale tells Celsias.com.

In "Time to Eat the Dog?: A Real Guide to Sustainable Living," Brenda and her husband Robert Vale, architects who concentrate on sustainable living, propose an unsavory idea: if you are going to keep pets, make sure they are edible so as to reduce the carbon footprint of the animals you keep.

For the less environmentally-literate, a "carbon footprint" is the amount of greenhouse gases we produce while driving, flying, eating, etc., which contribute to climate change, or global warming. "Sustainable living" refers to efforts to reduce consumption of natural resources and the production of greenhouse gases by "altering methods of transportation, energy consumption and diet."

"If you have a German shepherd or similar-sized dog, for example, its impact every year is exactly the same as driving a large car around," Brenda tells The Dominion Post. Studying the amount of land and energy it takes to make the dog food your pet eats every year, the Vales found that a dog's carbon pawprint was twice that of a Toyota Land Cruiser being driven 6,213 miles a year. A cat's eco pawprint was "slightly less than a Volkswagen Golf," and keeping two hamsters is the same as owning a plasma TV.

Are the Vales suggesting we eat our cats and dogs? Not exactly, they say, admitting that the title of their book was a "shock tactic." "We are not advocating eating anyone's pet cat or dog, [but] there is certainly some truth in the fact that if we have edible pets like chickens for their eggs and meat, and rabbits and pigs, we will be compensating for the impact of other things on our environment," Brenda Vale tells The Dominion Post.

Not surprisingly, the Vales do not own any dogs or cats.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Or, you know, we could be vegetarians (or at least conscious of what we digest). Since the meat industry contributes twice as much to Global Warming than all the transportation vehicles.

Curious about your own carbon footprint? Check out the Carbon Footprint Calculator at The Nature Conservancy website. You'll note it doesn't inquire about the number and type of pets in your household.

BAT or CAT?


Since Maisy crashed our "simple life" party, we've been searching for the right tools to start working with her reactions to other dogs. She's distracted. She doesn't respond to food from certain distances from other dogs.

These distractions can actually be useful training rewards. Dogs know what they want (for instance, the squirrel) and they know how to get it (chasing, pulling).
However, the ways that Maisy (the hunter!) is working for these things are not safe while on a walk (in suburbia).
BAT training conceptualizes that at some point our dogs learned which favorable actions makes an event occur. Somewhere along the way, Maisy learned that pushing everything else (tsuki!) out of the way gets her a human's full attention.. she learned that whining at the table gets her fed.. she learned that barking and pulling towards other dogs gets her (?)____ I'm not sure on that one. What does she want? To run up to them, tail wagging, in their face? Mouth their scruff? Bark at them? Mount them? She does all of these things.

So, according to BAT training, we have to identify the trigger (sees other dogs approaching) and give her a small dose that does not tip her beyond her threshold of self control (so she sees it, but is not in full out barking/pulling mode) to get the result we want (calm). This happens in small doses until the trigger becomes the real deal - until she's calmly approaching a dog. She should now be learning that NOT fixating, NOT barking, and NOT pulling allow her to meet the dog. Consistently.
From a BAT trainer:
The behavior is all we’re really trying to adjust. When you’re done, you have the same trigger as before, and the same consequence, but a new behavior. The core idea that I love from CAT is the idea of using the reward that the dog is already getting to reward a new, better behavior.

So if the dog is already getting paid for barking at the mailman by having him leave, the new set-up is to pay the dog for calm behavior by having a pseudo-mailman leave as a consequence for good behavior.

With the Antecedent -> Behavior -> Consequence model, you have something like:

Antecedent -> Behavior 1 -> Consequence
being replaced by
Antecedent -> Behavior 2 -> Consequence

(Think of ‘antecedent’ as a cue or something that signals the behavior is about to be paid for.)

So
Mailman arrives -> Barking -> Mailman leaves
is replaced by
Mailman arrives -> dog turns away -> Mailman leaves

I love that part. It means that the environment itself, which created the problem, will now start rewarding your dog. You will need to have several friends practice being the mailman before it works for real.

The bigger picture of BAT is that it includes real-world positive reinforcement, too:

Mom comes home -> jumping -> petting/attention
is replaced by
Mom comes home -> sitting -> petting/attention



On the other end of the training spectrum is CAT. CAT uses distance/disappearance as a reward for the desired (friendly, non aggressive) behavior. This training waits for the dog to overcome its threshold and exhibit calm behaviors. Then the trigger goes away. The results are promised to be stronger and much faster than counter conditioning (BAT-esq) training. "In other words, classical counter-conditioning changes the dog's emotions in order to change his behavior. In contrast, CAT utilizes "operant conditioning," where the goal is changing the dog's behavior in a way that will likely produce a subsequent emotional change."
This method is harder for me to get my head around in terms of results, so I'll let one of the developers tell you in her own words
In the CAT procedure we use the reinforcer the dog is already working for. We are listening him by observing the outcome he gets from his aggressive behavior. It is usually distance from aversive stimuli. In our treatment we provide the outcome he wants only when he behaves in safe, friendly ways. This means his needs are still being met, but they aren't putting the lives of others or his own life at risk any more.

But a funny thing happens in the treatment. He learns to like other people and dogs.

Our experimental question asked whether aggression could be reduced by the contingent withdrawal of an aversive stimulus, introduced at low intensities. We found out more than our questions asked... that we not only ended up with dogs that tolerated the strangers they were once aggressive toward, but we ended up with the dogs being friendly toward the strangers. (This has been successfully replicated with feral cats, too.)

The way we determine how the dog views the procedure is that at the end of the procedure the dog is soliciting interaction from the formerly aversive stimulus whereas previously he was attacking it. He is not just ignoring the stimulus or turning to his owner in its presence, either, he's just not worried about it any more. For some dogs who are more stoic in their general demeanor and aren't goofily friendly in the first place, these dogs often just start hanging out with the other dog without attacking or withdrawing... they just start treating them in a way that is accepting.

One reason we use negative reinforcement -- probably the most important, is that the dogs have to learn to deal with aversive stimuli that trigger aggression, or else they will have a truncated or restricted life, or a life of fear and defensiveness. We want them to learn that the world isn't such a bad place and that there are other ways to deal with new people/animals that are easier, more effective and produce better results.

By training aggressive dogs to be "not aggressive" by giving them food or other positive reinforcers, we introduce an arbitrary reinforcer that doesn't help them deal with the actual problem of being concerned about strangers. In theory it sounds good--teach them to defer to the owner-- but what if you could teach the dog that he doesn't have to turn away from fearsome stimuli and hope his owner is on the ball, but instead simply not be afraid of the stimuli any more?

That's what we've managed to accomplish through negative reinforcement combined with an errorless learning (below threshold) procedure that we haven't seen accomplished with positive reinforcement. This is the difference between treating a behavior functionally (providing the reinforcer the animal is already working for, but providing it contingently upon safe, friendly behaviors (as part of a shaping process) rather than the way he is currently earning the outcome- through aggression.

By the end we have a decoy that is now a conditioned reinforcer... and thus no longer aversive.


As we go forward, I believe BAT is the way to go with Maisy... but I'm not entirely sure just yet. It gives me a lot to think about though.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Impoundation and Euthanization of American Rights

Its stories like this from small town America that scare the shit out of me. When will my town challenge my rights? When will I have to fight for my dogs? Way to go, Mashpee.

MASHPEE — There was a collective sigh of relief among dog owners at Mashpee High School last night after residents resoundingly voted down a proposed pit bull bylaw at the annual fall town meeting.

The proposed bylaw would have prohibited residents from owning more than one of the dogs, would have made it mandatory that the dogs be spayed or neutered, forced owners to get expensive liability insurance, and placed the responsibility on the owners of mixed breeds to prove that their dog is not a pit bull through DNA testing, among other restrictions.

The article was placed on the warrant by petition and lacked the support of the finance committee and selectmen.

In the end, it was defeated by a deafening voice vote after 239 registered voters sped through budget adjustments and changes to the town's zoning code.

Those against the bylaw turned out in force, far outnumbering those who were for it, with some nonresidents coming from as far as Plymouth to speak to the merits of the dogs.

"I'm very happy," Mashpee resident Michelle Storm said after the vote, as dog lovers petted her 3-year-old female pit bull and service dog Bugsy. "This is a big relief off of my chest. We have another (pit bull) and I medically need (Bugsy). I don't know what I would do if one of them was taken away."

The warrant article made waves in recent weeks as residents and animal activists challenged the legality and restrictiveness of the proposed bylaw's language.

The article was added by petition after Ashumet Road residents Carmen and Melissa Shay, who have two young girls, tried unsuccessfully to prevent a neighbor from moving next door with six of the dogs.

The proposal, which was modeled after a bylaw already in place in Canton, gave animal control officers the power to impound and even euthanize dogs whose owners were not in compliance or suspected of not being in compliance.

The Canton bylaw has yet to be challenged in court.

Anatomy of a Raid

Who decides these dogs' fate? Health? Who does the evaluations? Are they fair? Subjective? Thorough? Recorded?

Laurens County, GA Raid:

...Half an hour into the raid, reports began to come in. The good news: The dogs were still there; news of the raid hadn't leaked. The bad news: There weren't 60 dogs, as anticipated; there were more. The final count was 97.

Most of the dogs were pit bull terriers; many were puppies. They were found cowering in cages or chained. Some older dogs were scarred -- possible signs of fighting, investigators said. Others were malnourished, simply skin and bone.

Their conditions were atrocious, according to Terry Wolf of the Dublin-Laurens County Humane Society.

"Their chains are too short to reach shelter, those who have shelter. The water that they have seems to be recent rainwater with algae in it, and I've seen no food bowls. Most of them are very timid," Wolf said. "They seem to be human-friendly, but they're attention starved, and they're definitely not socialized. You can tell they've been living hidden in the woods, out of sight."

...Several hours into the raid, the first group of dogs was transported from the woods to an undisclosed location. A CNN crew was allowed to go but could shoot only from inside this building.

Investigators feared that if there were any identifiable marks outside the property, someone might recognize it and steal the dogs. Authorities couldn't take that chance. But they did allow video of some of the dogs from inside the cages. They had taken many puppies, which looked helpless.

Volunteers feared one puppy wouldn't make it through the night.

The next step for these dogs is to determine which ones are healthy enough to possibly be adopted. Some, sadly, won't share that fate. They'll have to be put down.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

8 Breeds

I saw this on save the pit bull, save the world and decided to do/post it here. I really do not think I will intentionally seek out a purebred again, but its fun to discover them.

IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE A DOG FROM EACH CKC/AKC “GROUP,” WHAT WOULD YOU CHOOSE AND WHY?
(excluding your own breeds)

Group 1- Sporting Group 2- Hound Group 3- Working Group 4- Terriers Group 5- Toys Group 6- Non Sporting Group 7- Herding Group 8 - Misc.

- - - - - - - - - -
Sporting:
I never saw myself with any of the bird/gun dog types that tend to be considered "sporting" but I think if I had the time, resources and purpose for such a dog - there are three I would highly consider.
First, the Spinone Italiano. It has a very griffon-esq look to it that I really like. It is said to need extra socialization as it is naturally cautious, not unlike my shibas, and happy with its family.
Second and third would be the German Shorthaired Pointer (my neighbor has the perfect GSP!), and the Vizsla, however, as stated above if I couldn't provide a natural outlet for their working purpose, I don't think I could ever keep with with their energy requirements! Maisy taught me to be cautionary with this detail... hunting dogs NEED a proper outlet, daily.

Hound:
I lived with a basset hound for about 8 months until he was adopted, and I loved that dog. Loved. I think based on my experience with him, I would love to experience the Petite Basset Griffon (love that look!) Vendeen. Second to the PBGV would be the Plott Hound. It has always intrigued me as a generally untapped breed of sorts, still with its high, aggressive hunting drive intact and a beautifully designed "woodsie" brindle coat. And Basenji's are a close second, but having Shibas is enough for me :)

Working:
Here's a fun catagory. Are these dogs truly bred for work? If so, a Rottweiler please! I have not met a single rottweiler that I didn't immediately want to kiss, and yet, through all the devotion they have for their families, there are still strains of them bred for work - be it protection or farm (herding) work - these dogs are built for just about any job.. I like that about a dog.




Terrier:
For no other reason than I like the "sound" of them, Staffordshire Bull Terrier.

"The Staffordshire Bull Terrier is extremely courageous and obedient, highly intelligent and affectionate with a sense of humor. This, coupled with its affection for

its friends, and children in particular, its off-duty quietness and trustworthy stability, makes it a foremost all-purpose dog. He looks forward to daily exercise, and his powerful jaws enj

oy a supply of sturdy chew toys. While he is a sweet-tempered, affectionate dog, his strength and determination require an experienced owner who can work with him in a firm, but gentle way."

Toy:
I can't really pick any that I'd honestly WANT to own, like for 12+ years. I like the idea of owning a pug - but we walk a lot in all weather. And I now would consider the Italian Greyhound, only having found out a lot about them after Maisy's DNA test indicated traces of them. However, even then, I don't think they would fit into our lifestyle except when we settle in to watch a movie or something.

Non-Sporting:

The non-sporting group are all dogs of a certain function that aren't recognized or utilized much in the US.

I would have trouble picking any of them (including the shiba inu)

only because I think the direction of breeding taken with all of them leaves a hella lot to be desired. They seem to be selected more for type in this category than for purpose or health. Perhaps for companion purposes only, the Tibetan Terrier is interesting enough.


Herding:
Only, and if only, I had the proper task for the dog : A Beauceron. It is beautiful, and rich in French history - The earliest record found so far of what is thought to be the Beauceron dates back to a Renaissance manuscript of 1578. In 1809, the abbey Rozier reported plain dogs guarding flocks and herds. In 1863, Pierre Megnin differentiated, with precision, two types of these sheep dogs: one with a long coat, which became known as the Berger de Brie (Briard), the other with a short coat, which is known as the Berger de Beauce (Beauceron). Second to that would be the Canaan dog, because they remind me of the version of a spitz that I long ago would have considered 'ideal'.


Miscellaneous:
This is an interesting group. As it stands now, I'm not sure I would choose any of these breeds to own.. for any purpose. But for posts sake, I'll say Norwegian Lundehund because of its ability to climb rocks to get the puffins and therefore has a fun "toe requirement" in its standard.

Name Change?

I wonder if I should change the name of the blog to reflect coverage of everything we do, not just limited to the Shiba Inu breed...

Any suggestions?

Monday, October 19, 2009

The Eagles made a mistake? Naw..

From the Times Herald...
With their eyes, wallets and hearts open, the Eagles last August volunteered for a franchise-defining choice. Michael Vick was available, and once everyone realized that they could make the money work, this was the simple either-or:...
Choose to reject Vick’s application on safe public-relations grounds. Or sign him and use him --- in the wildcat formation, as a holder, on special teams, in trick plays and maybe even as a change-of-pace quarterback on a day when nothing else is working.

There didn’t seem to be a losing side of that decision ... until now. Because it’s apparent that Eagles are shoving themselves into the worst of both positions.

That’s what happened Sunday, early and late. On their way into the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, the Eagles were forced to pass the now-obligatory bands of protesters, still upset that Vick is in the NFL despite his prominent role in a dog-fighting circuit. And on their way out, they were 13-9 losers to the Oakland Raiders, one of those NFL teams believed to be inept --- that after Vick was on the field for one play, a four-yard rushing loss.


Maybe Bad Rap's banner got to them :)

Monday Mornin' AW!

Monday morning, 6:30 am, 32 degrees - this warmed my heart (forgive the cell phone quality):

Sunday, October 18, 2009

COI

"The breeding of purebred dogs is akin to (breeding laboratory mice)...(most breeds) are becoming progressively more inbred. My observation is that most are
on the road to extinction, but most breeders do not even realize they are part of an experiment."
John B. Armstrong, Ph.D.

COI = coefficient of inbreeding.


This practice is fairly new to my brainwaves, though its been around far longer than my 0% COI existence began. It's hard for me to wrap my head around actually... what is the grand purpose?

To preserve some cosmetic attribute about a breed of dog? A type? A tail length? Coat marking? Drive? Stature?

In a world where 3-4 million companion animals are euthanized each year in US shelters... why create when there is any percentage of an inbreeding coefficient? If you can't find a suitable match in purebred dogs for their individual purposes, can't you call it a day and wait for that match to come along? If breeding dogs is a numbers game, then I think man has gone to far in his game of playing God, let's step back and survey what we are doing to the future of these purebred dogs. Dogs are not numbers, they are living, breathing creatures in our care and (unfortunate, considering) control.

I read once that inbreeding is like a cancer - well, inbreeding leads to cancer, and then some:
Research in the fields of genetics, immunology, and veterinary medicine, is turning up more and more information indicating that high levels of inbreeding can have deleterious effects on health. Inbreeding depression, a complex of behavioral and physical reproductive problems, have long been recognized. Inbreeding can increase the frequency of a disease in a population, sometimes quite rapidly. Inbreeding leads to increased incidence of immune-mediated disease and cancer. (From Playing COI)


Can someone better aquainted with the cavalier world of breeding explain why this is an acceptable practice?

Friday, October 16, 2009

Breed Indetermination

BioPet Vet Lab has processed Miss Maisy's DNA and has sent us results. I did not expect a life shattering discovery, or even a conclusive one. It really was entirely to satisfy curiosity. I now understand why people take multiple doggie DNA tests for their pups and take the average conclusion as the conclusion. Upon reading what they have determined, I noticed a few things..

Statements, in small and italicized print, such as:
The BioPet DNA Breed Identification Test is designed for the sole purpose of identifying breeds found in the genetic composition of mixed breed dogs. We cannot determine whether or not a dog is purebred. we can merely identify DNA that matches the dogs that make up our database.

The enclosed analysis has been compiled based on the results obtained from your DNA sample submission, and has been run with a reasonable amount of certainty. It is possible that there have been some random changes (random...changes?) within your dog's DNA which may have affected the results. However, our testing procedures and database are designed to recognize that this may happen and minimize any affect. It is understood that no analytical test is 100% accurate. BioPet is not responsible for any inferences made about any individual dog based upon the provided information. BioPet's test is based upon our database of AKC recognized breeds. If your dog contains other breeds, not in our database, it may give rise to the identification of breeds earlier in your pet's history and may therefore provide a seemingly unlikely result for your dog.

We believe that 92.5% of the mixed breed dog population in the USA is covered by our 62 validated breeds... By comparing your dog's DNA with our database, we can identify which of our 63 validated breeds are present. 62? 63? Sure.


A mixed breed dog may not be easily recognized in the breeds revealed through DNA testing.
Given the current state of knowledge of dog genetics, one cannot predict how genes from multiple breeds will interact to produce the characteristics seen in your dog.
However, once the contributing breeds are detected, you can see how those characteristics carry through to makeup your mixed breed dog.

We haven't yet found a breed that's indistinguishable from another breed.

And my favorite: Customers can request that their dog's DNA be retested free of charge whenever the lab adds a new breed. Customers can check the company's Web site for breed updates.

Super.

Her "Ancestry Analysis Certificate" in which
The list on the certificate shows the detected breeds in decreasing order. The most prevalent breed is listed first, the least prevalent being last... Level 1: Over 75% of the DNA found in your dog is from the breed listed. Level 2: Each breed listed represents between 37-74% of your dog's DNA Level 3: Each breed listed represents between 20-36% of your dog's DNA Level 4: Each breed listed represents between 10-19% of your dog's DNA Level 5: Each breed listed represents less than 10% of your dog's DNA reveals that most likely, Maisy did not have purebred parents. She may be a distant generational mix of Greyhound (level 4), Afghan Hound (level 5), Italian Greyhound (level 2), Miniature Pinscher (level 2), Boston Terrier (level 3), Bull Terrier (level 3), Collie (level 4) and West Highland White Terrier (level 5... and wtf?).

Another FAQ in italics:
It is understood that no analytical test is 100% accurate. If a breed is present in your dog that is in our database of 63 validated breeds, it should be detected. However, if DNA is found from a breed that is not in our data base, it will be assigned to the most closely related breed, or to breeds that are further back in your dog’s ancestry. So, we can still safely assume that when people ask us what she is, though we have a certificate, our answer can still be "Dunno", or my new favorite answer "lurcher".


The bigger question I have, why isn't Pit Bull on the list? Surely many of us get these DNA tests to validate our assumption of a "pit mix"... per the company:
Why is pit bull not on your list?
The EDP Validated Breeds are based on breeds recognized by the American Kennel Club® (AKC). The term “pit bull” has come to describe several types of dogs, often of mixed breed, that share similar physical characteristics. There are several AKC breeds with characteristics often shared by dogs referred to as “pit bull” that are in our database, such as the Boxer, Bulldog, Bull Terrier and Mastiff, so these breeds could be identified.

Thanks BioPet.

The Eagles TAWK

I have a tough time being critical on those truly dedicated to a positive community outreach, especially when animals are involved... but the motive behind this one makes me skeptical (and the photo op with HSUS big wigs). But I hope it works and benefits many animals and their owners.

Eagles Launch Treating Animals With Kindness (TAWK) Initiative


The Eagles are also announcing the Eagles TAWK series, a public service campaign and a dedicated Web site.

1. TAWK Series – The TAWK Series will bring animal experts to local elementary and middle schools to educate students on responsible pet care and the amazing abilities that dogs have as working and service animals.

2. Public Service Campaign – In collaboration with the animal advocacy community, the public service campaign will involve Eagles players and will educate the public on critical animal welfare issues and inspire action among target audiences.

3. TAWK Web site – An educational website about the TAWK program will be available through the PhiladephiaEagles.com webpage. The website includes not only information and updates about the TAWK program, but detailed facts about animal welfare issues as well. The website will be used to link our fans with animal organizations throughout the area.

4. Promotional Executions – The Eagles will develop and execute comprehensive media strategies to promote TAWK and other related causes. Promotional outlets including Eagles Television Network produced shows such as the Donovan McNabb Show, the Andy Reid Show and the Eagles Kid's Club Show will be included.

5. Organizational collaboration – The Eagles will support animal welfare organizations in their fundraising and awareness programs by committing various Eagles personnel and resources to expand their efforts.

Sequence










The Grey Norwegian Moose Dog

So cool, thanks for posting, Retrieverman! Elkhound hunting..

3 Amigos

My group of rowdy dogs never stop making me smile.

The Sooks:


Kitsu:


Crazy Maisy in her Mario Bros 'shirt':


Kitsu, mad because I made him wear it for 30 seconds:

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Insurance.

Because BSL targets the wrong end of the leash, From United We Bark:

Dear Prospective Clients,

My name is Calah Kulm and I am a local agent for Farmers Insurance in Spokane, WA. As many of you have probably heard, Farmers is now insuring homes that have ANY type of dog breed. There is no official announcement per se but all states have recently changed their underwriting guidelines to not discriminate against breeds. If your agent is uncertain, simply have him/her call their underwriting department to ask about it. Also, please call me with any questions and/or concerns and particularly if you live within my area and would like to meet with me! I look forward to helping you all and again, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.


Calah Kulm
Farmers Insurance
41 W. Riverside Ste 220
Spokane, WA 99201
Bus: (509) 270-2898
ckulm@farmersagent.com

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Pup Pumpkin

Perhaps my 09 Xmas Card?

Monday, October 12, 2009

October is ADOPT A SHELTER DOG month!

Considering a dog? Now is the best time to adopt a shelter dog. Beautiful, normal, stable dogs come from shelters! Dogs of all ages, breeds, mixes, sizes...

Our shelter alumni:
Bodhi

Bear

Kobe

Hanzo

Henson

Jiro

and Maisy



Check out a shelter dog near you at Petfinder.com

Check out this GREAT article by Whole Dog Journal about making your dog's new adopting work for life.

Check out Petsugar's short list "9 Questions to Ask Yourself Before Adopting"

Disenchanted, officially.

Did you ever think you were really "into" something, really wanting to get involved, support something until you started to uncover the dirty little secrets that hid behind it? The skeletons in the closet, so to speak, that everyone else seemed to know about and not over think/analyze so they too could remain supportive of that thing?

Ignorance is truly bliss when it comes to breeding, breed clubs, breed enthusiasts, and other such things.

I am officially disenchanted with the world of purebred dogs.

Spoilage

Truth in numbers.

Can we fathom 100 dead animals? 200? How about 1009 on a single property in small, dark cages?

The owner of a northwest Houston home where more than 1,000 animals were seized after being found in deplorable conditions agreed to surrender the animals to the Houston SPCA and will forfeit his residence to Harris County to pay for their medical and boarding costs, based on an agreement reached in court Wednesday...
...Boado, who had been keeping the animals to sell at flea markets, declined to comment as he left court with his attorneys and his brother Wednesday. But Harris County Attorney Vince Ryan said the agreement was a good outcome for what he described as one of the largest animal seizures in U.S. history...
...

Boado's attorney, Brian Storts, said his client recognizes some responsibility for his actions and described him as an “honest, law-abiding citizen” who agreed to the forfeiture because it was in his best interest.

“It certainly sets a precedent and makes an example of the importance of these kinds of laws,” Storts said.

“He certainly did not intend for those animals to be mistreated and worked hard at being able to treat them properly,” Storts said. “The credibility of his business was in being able to provide healthy animals. Unfortunately, not much different than a grocery store, you have a certain amount of spoilage, and that's a whole lot of what we're faced with here.”

...[Houston SPCA] raided Boado's property Sept. 23 and found 1,009 animals in filthy conditions, most crammed into tight cages, many without basic necessities such as food and water. Both live and dead animals were found caged.

Officers found birds with broken legs, a German shepherd and a goat that were extremely emaciated and a live duck infested with maggots, court documents show. Numerous blind rodents were on the property.

Ducks and geese were drinking from puddles that had dead chickens in them, and one trailer was filled with caged animals kept in the dark with no food, water or heat, a county attorney's office report shows. Some of the mice had cannibalized each other, said county attorney's office spokeswoman Ella Tyler.

Officers seized three dogs, numerous ducks and chickens, 100 parakeets and parrots, and numerous iguanas, hamsters and rats. The property was riddled with equipment and trash, photographs show. In all, 100 to 200 of the animals have died, said Assistant County Attorney Linda Geffin.

(click for full story)

Can we even fathom that many animals? Dead? Spoilage...

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Maisy's Jacket

Maisy has a very thin, whippet-type coat. This October morning was a cruel 33 degrees and I had a shaking Maisy on our AM walk.

I had been planning on buying one of these adorable fleece jackets, which are designed for whippets and modeled by a beautiful one eyed whippet :)

I even considered opening the sewing machine I got last Christmas and making one. Someday.

But until either of these things happen - introducing my makeshift-Maisy-warmer!

Instructions:
1. Buy a pair of obnoxiously colored $5 sweatpants, woman's size L from Target... (or dig in your closet for the ones you regrettably bought last year)

2. Size 'um up & cut (leaving ample room for slide-on-off ease, and leg slits). Thigh to knee worked well for 26lb Maisy.

3. Try it on the cold dog

4. Realize your leg slits are cut too high

5. Cut off second leg, repeat step 2 more accurately. Voila. Good enough.




6. Snuggle with warm dog

Training Maisy

Maisy is just a bundle of energy... pure energy. She's alive, alert and she rarely stops to nap!

Keeping in mind that it has only been three weeks since she was sprung from the shelter, we realized that we may need some direction in helping to get a better handle on focus training, so we called a trainer that was referred to us.

I want to want to work with this trainer, but words like "dominance" and "pack leader" always piss me right off. She believes Maisy is dominant. And that we need to step up and become the leaders. I think I've been over exposed to Cesar's army and now those words just leave a bad taste in my mouth. And she said these words quite a bit.
And fed pupperoni without asking first. I'm a canine nutrition nutbag - pupperoni is not in our repertoire. But I digress.

She also suggested that we break up our dog's playing because she thinks they play too aggressively. I've based most of my trust on their compatibility from their ability to control their play and self regulate what they can handle without human interruption. Its been a total experiment in integrating Maisy but already I can leave them alone in the house with no worries of fighting. I think a lot of people are afraid of the teeth baring, growly, high pitched noise type play that *most* dogs exhibit. And those people will break the play up and create a more frustrated group of dogs. This is just my premature, untested, unscientific theory but it works here in this house, with this 'pack'.
Of course there are times when the play becomes an argument. And I let it pan out and a majority of the time the dogs sort it out on their own and go about the next bout of play or nap time. I can count on one hand the times that they stay boxed and focused and I called them off.
This, too, is based on the fact that I am lucky to have three, adult, stable dogs. Throw in an unstable dog, or one that isn't used to being in a group of dogs (sharing, play-style fluctuation, etc) and then we might have issues that merit interruption.

And the last bit of information from the trainer that struck me wrong. Fear. She believes Maisy is fearful based on the fact that we took a walk around the block, considering these factors:
a. trainer had Maisy on a very short, tight leash and a martingale collar (I walk her in an easy walk for control in the neighborhood and a standard harness on hikes)
b. trainer was jerking the leash lightly to get Maisy to not pull
c. when trainer couldn't get Maisy to look, sit or focus, she pushed her back end to the ground which I never, ever do and asked her not to.
d. Maisy is 300% focused on trees (squirrels, leaves), the ground (bunnies, squirrels) and the road (leaves, squirrels) all of the time, at the same time.

I live with a fearful dog, and his name is Kitsune. I realize there are numerous kinds of fears and numerous combinations of ways dogs exhibit their fears. Maisy is hyper aware and full of energy, and fairly fresh out of the shelter with little to no training, especially on leash.
She approaches strange dogs in a very forward manner, and basically ignores people except for a tail wag when she sees them. When they greet her she's great, except she jumps.
Her tail is never not wagging and she's a hunting machine.
She is not fearful in the sense the trainer conveyed. I believe working dogs need a true sense of fear just to get the job done, but its not the day to day sort of fear that housepets have. Maisy is a hunter.
And yet, when I countered this on-the-spot-diagnosis, I got an earful about how we are in denial of our dogs because they are like family and we don't always want to admit these things.
I would admit to you on the spot if I thought she was fearful of the outside, but I disagree. She is hyper focused on that which she wants to hunt, not on me, which is why we called for training.


My dear, sainted husband made a really good point that I'm still thinking about - that I automatically disagree with people when they use words like "dominance" "alpha" "aggression" "pack leader"... that we are actually just using different means to explain the same result. When you say dominant, I say pushy. When you say aggressive, I say reactive. When you say pack leadership, I say management.
Could that be it? Could I be a word snob? Do I need to look past it and go with the obedience training flow?

My bigger hang up is this : obedience training suppresses the dog. Dogs know they can sit, but we insist they do it when we ask. And then we make them stay. And heel. And wait. All of their energies are turning into frustrations if your only outlet of time spent with puppy is in obedience training.
I want my dogs to play, aggressively as it may seem.
I want my dogs to be aware of rodents and rabbits. They are hunting dogs!
I want my dogs to be what they are without breaking them for model canine citizenship.

But. We live in the real world, the human world, smack in the middle of suburbia. So I need to bend and compromise. So will we call her again? I'm not sure yet.

In the meantime, we are teaching Maisy to "LOOK"


And we are asking her to "SIT"


Perhaps in time we can accomplish this outside the house to help manage her while on the trail or in the neighborhood to comply with our comfort zone. Times like these I wish I lived on an island and let my dogs go wild... I could watch & learn from them forever.

Sunday Snuggles

Its either pure love, or the colder weather, but this is happening quite a bit these days:




A Real Dog, by Finding Sirius

I thought this was beautiful, and wanted to share:


There are so many neglected and abused dogs...they are the ones that need our support, our intervention, our voice. The happy, go-lucky dogs of this world who have good forever families don't....no matter what kind of kibble they eat, or if they can't hold a sit-stay for a full minute or if they wear a different outfit every week or if the only papers to their name is a copy of the shelter adoption form. They don't need to be saved or spoken for on behalf of their well-being. Their owners don't need to be lectured. And neither the owner nor the dog needs to be judged. Do you know how you can spot a "real dog"? Because they are happy.

A real dog is a happy dog. A real dog loves to eat and sniff and bark and play. A real dog gets a chance, now and then, to run. A real dog has a warm, safe place where they love to sleep. A real dog is loved. And a real dog loves you back. Tell me how it gets any more real than that?
-From Finding Sirius blog

Friday, October 9, 2009

Let the Wild Rumpus Start!

How do three dogs (each under 30lbs) manage to turn my house into a pile of destuffed fluff, mis-placed pillows/rugs, scattered cardboard flecks and random debris?

They make my house a home.

Flawed Dogs

(I can't wait to read this, er, read this to my godson...)


Everybody loves an underdog, especially one that triumphs in the end. And Sam, the big-hearted dachshund and star of Pulitzer Prize-winning comic strip creator Berkeley Breathed's debut novel, FLAWED DOGS, is no exception. He's loveable (try scratching him behind the ears), impeccably good-looking (check out his glistening coat) and charming almost to a fault. But if you cross him, look out! You'll never meet a dog with a more entrenched (and unwavering) taste for revenge.

In the beginning, Sam was a dog to be envied: his owner, Heidy, adored him; he had the run of the house and sprawling countryside; and he was on the fast track to win top marks in the country's most prestigious dog shows. But when Cassius, a jealous poodle jockeying for Heidy's affection and the "Best in Show" title, frames Sam for a crime he didn't commit, the once-cushy, now-scorned pooch is forced to go on the run or suffer the deadly consequences.

Over a series of tension-mounting chapters, Sam finds himself in a variety of disastrous situations (hint: evil animal-testing medical research lab, gruesome dog fighting ring, and depressing homeless animal shelter), where he is called upon to win back his freedom. With cunning and grit that only a true underdog can muster, Sam proves his prowess all the way to the Westminster Dog Show where he stages a hilarious coup in a rematch with Cassius, the likes of which canine-lovers have never seen.

Breathed's vibrant, larger-than-life illustrations are an added bonus throughout the book, and his storytelling is infused with adrenaline. And although the writing is fast and upbeat, there are still moments that will stop to touch your heart, especially if you're a dog owner. Moments like the aforementioned dog fighting and animal shelters are tinged with real-world drama, and the reader can't help but feel for these vulnerable pooches.

You loved"Bloom County." You couldn't get enough of "Opus." And Edwurd Fudwupper of EDWURD FUDWUPPER FIBBED BIGfame? He may have been a liar, but he sure was entertaining. Now, do yourself a favor and pick up FLAWED DOGS. Get to know Sam. Then take a trip to your local animal shelter and adopt a Sam of your own. They don't call them man's best friend for nothing.

--- Reviewed by Alexis Burling

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Snatch's Hare (lure) Coursing



Aside from the rambling profanity and Pikey alike (not to mention gambling and mobster activities that make Snatch so re-watchable), watch for the Lurchers - dogs, before you ask. And the Hare.

My goal this month is to get a video clip of Maisy running like that, she runs just like the hare - flying midair twice in one movement... it's naturally astounding.

Update: Jiro San!

Dogster.com: Picture of Jiro, a Shiba Inu dog on Dogster


"Well, it's been almost a month now since Jiro came to live with us and although there have been some stressful times we can't imagine life without him now! He seems to have adjusted well to his new living quarters and schedule and had no problem making himself at home here. He's having a blast playing with his new sister Dakota and there is almost ALWAYS a game of chase going on here these days. Other than that this boy is possibly one of the sweetest pups I've ever met and while he has a few quirks I'm trying to work out, I'm thankful every day that I adopted him!"

Maisy | The Lurcher?
















Image from dogbreedinfo.com (which is suffocating me with cesarisms!)


My pic of Maisy

No matter what the DNA test brings back, I think I can safely assume Maisy is a Lurcher of some sort.
The Lurcher is not a dog breed, but rather a type of dog. It is a hardy crossbred sighthound that is generally a cross between a sighthound and a working breed, usually a pastoral dog or Terrier. Generally, the aim of the cross is to produce a sighthound with more intelligence, a canny animal suitable for the original purpose of the lurcher, poaching. Most lurchers today are used for general pest control, typically rabbits, hares, and foxes. They have also been successfully used on deer. The modern Lurcher is growing from its old image of disrepute to heights of popularity as an exceptional family dog, and many groups have been founded to rehome lurchers as family pets.


Could Maisy be a Lurcher in terms of a whippet/terrier mix?

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

The Cur, aka, everything I want in a dog

From Wikipedia:

Breeds of cur are usually not recognized by major show registries, and selection for certain looks has never been a real factor in their development. They were selected mainly for hunting or work ability, although some breeds of cur are also known for herding ability. As a result, in most of the cur breeds the appearance standard is extremely flexible, enough so that a complete breed appearance standard is difficult to create. The resultant diversity in appearance and selection for physical ability result in breeds that tend to be genetically sound and healthy.


Now that is the kind of thing I could get behind. Thanks to Maisy and Retrieverman for the heads up!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Maisy | The Mountain Cur?


The Mountain Cur, perhaps one of the utmost "original" breeds in America, one of the best bay dogs around (depending on who you talk to, I suppose) and perhaps living in my house! Maisy is clearly an exceptional dog, but I had no idea what amazing heritage might flow through her veins.

According to the United Mountain Cur Association:

Breed Standard
Color - Black, Blonde, Blue, Brindle, Chocolate, Red, White, Yellow and variations of these colors are permissible.
Head - Wide with short heavy muzzle, sculptured in clean lines without jowls or excess flesh preferred on the sides or under the eyes or temples preferred.
Lips - Medium thickness, firm of line and fitted neatly without folds at corners.
Nose - Square preferred over round with nostrils well opened.
Teeth - Strong, well formed and aligning in a perfect scissors bite.
Eyes - Set well apart with inner and outer corners on same level, never slanted.
Ears - Attached high and be in full control when alert.
Chest - Broad and deep, moderately curved ribs.
Neck - Strong and well constructed, not too long.
Back - Broad and strong, straight and never swayed.
Legs - Straight and muscular with strong bone, set for speed. Also, they must be parallel to medium line of body.
Tail - Natural bob or full is preferred. Full skeletal development is desired, do not breed continually for bob and develop short skeletal issues.
Feet - Cat paw type, not flat, and well muscled.
Dew claws - Are at the owner’s discretion.
Size/Weight - Due to the versatility of this breed and the different uses that it is often used for it is impossible to set an optimum size limit. With this in mind the standard will be height and weight proportionate to size.

Hunting Style
The Mountain Cur is a fast, hard hunter that runs the track with its head in the air. Open, semi-open, or silent on track it has a clear bark that can be heard a long distance. When a hot track is not immediately available, the Mountain Cur will circle and drift on a cold track until it locates a hot track. Mountain Curs are courageous fighters on dangerous game. This breed is intelligent, with a strong desire to please, so, despite its strong treeing instincts on all game, the Mountain Cur is easily discouraged from tracking unwanted game. A Mountain Cur responds better to training if it has lots of human contact. In addition to hunting, Mountain Curs make great family companions and watch dogs.



And for Maisy? Well, her snout may be a tad narrow and she may have a full tail and higher set ears, but I think this dog (and the one pictured above) are dead ringers for a Maisy doppelganger!

Who knew?

Why I Can't Buy a Dog..

Snippet from Lurchers, Terriers & Ferrets:
The strongest, fittest hares survived to breed and further enhance the species. The weaker specimens maybe wouldn't.
To my mind this makes coursing preferable to shooting which is unselective. I could never bring myself to shoot a hare for this amazing mammal was born to run.


Why can't dog breeding be like that? Natural selection?

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Cutless

Not as entirely un-dog related as it seems. This is how I got my first dog, a scrappy hound mix named Woodsie. He was my Cutless.


Jay Leno + Chris Rock = WTF?!

AS IF you couldn't make yourself look like any more of a pair of dooshbags.. you tell us your Vick commentary on national TV:

Jay Leno: "It's amazing to me that you mistreat a dog and you lose your career and go to jail for two years."

Chris Rock: "What the hell did Michael Vick do, man? A dog, a pit bull ain't even a real dog a pit bull. A pit bull, that's the white stuff. Dogs are white mans best friend - dogs have never been good to black people."

Misinformed pair of idiots. Check out Bad Rap's blog for a much better post on this..

Breaking the house.

Shiba Inu housebreak really easily, and if they do not - something is wrong (either owner error or dog health, etc). How do I know?

Training Maisy the art of "holding it" brings me back to when we fostered my favorite dog of all time, Linus the Basset Hound. That was a grueling 8 months of trial and error with housebreaking. It came down to 1. prevention in terms of timing, 2. reward & 3. Nature's Miracle. It took 6 solid months to get it down to a science with that basset hound (and I think I was pretty damn diligent). We only got to enjoy it a whole 2 months before he was adopted!!

This is compared to the several shiba inus that have come from various places such as Tsuki-Puppy-Mill, Kobe/Hanzo/Jiro-shelter, Hachi-outdoor-life, & Kitsu-foster-home. Tsuki took approximately 2 weeks to housebreak, but she was living in a cage 24/7 before we brought her home. Hachi took a bit longer, but she did have a complicated spay surgery to blame.

Maisy is making this interesting, and luckily Nature's Miracle (and my trusted Bissell!) still exists because I think we're going to be using a lot of it.



Anyone care to share their non-shiba dog housebreaking time lines?

Friday, October 2, 2009

Vizsla?! Really?

One of my favorite "dog-knows-it-all" neighbors thinks Maisy is part Vizsla. I don't see it, but you don't question a man who walks his Cane Corso in suburbia!

Comparisons:

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Adopt.



The Ball. A big hit. Thanks Planet Dog. And Kristin :)

Why I love "The Onion"

Michael Vick Fails To Inspire Team With 'Great' Dogfighting Story


PHILADELPHIA—Michael Vick's pregame pep talk Sunday, in which he recounted the events of a brutal 2004 dogfight between his pit bull terrier Zebro and rival pit bull Maniac, failed to inspire his teammates in any way whatsoever, Eagles team sources reported.

Vick, who was playing in his first NFL game since serving an 18-month prison sentence, called the 10-minute story "really motivational," and reportedly failed to understand why his graphic recounting of how Zebro ripped out Maniac's larynx caused teammates to stagger out of the player tunnel and onto Lincoln Financial Field with their heads hanging.

"I don't know what their problem is, because that story pumps me up every time," Vick said during a postgame press conference. "It's a classic underdog story: On one side of the dogfighting pit you had Maniac, who was a beast, and on my end you had Zebro, who was pretty good, but not great. Yet we had trained him hard. We strengthened his hind legs by forcing him to constantly jump at a teasing stick; we emotionally tortured him so that he would attack everything in sight; and from the time he was a little puppy, we toughened him up by beating him with a metal baton."

"I told my teammates that the stakes were high, because if Zebro had lost, I would have either electrocuted him, drowned him, or slammed his body to the ground until he was dead," Vick added. "How is that not inspiring?"

According to Eagles players, Vick's voice increased in intensity at key moments throughout the pep talk, and he was at his most impassioned when he spoke of how Zebro continued to fight despite the fact that numerous chunks of flesh had been ripped from his body.

Vick also sought to motivate his team by comparing the Eagles' weekly preparation to Zebro's, saying that just as Vick had forced his pit bull to drag a tire with his mouth for hours on end to strengthen his jaw, the Eagles defense had put in the training necessary to stop quarterback Matt Cassel.

Sources confirmed that by the end of the locker room speech, the Eagles were so demoralized they could barely muster the will to put their hands into the team circle for a group cheer.

"I don't know why he told us those things," said Eagles quarterback Kevin Kolb, visibly disturbed as he told reporters that Vick looked proud when he explained how Zebro nearly lost consciousness several times throughout the fight. "I spent the first half of the game trying to get all that imagery out of my head: the bloody pit, the cigar smoke, grown men shouting as dogs ripped each other to shreds. It was so messed up that it didn't even sound real."

"They turned those dogs into monsters and made them kill each other for their own sick enjoyment," Kolb added. "For their own fucking enjoyment."

Running back LeSean McCoy echoed Kolb, saying that at no time during the game did he draw on the thought of Zebro losing half his ear as a source of inspiration.

"Before we went out on the field, [Vick] told us how the dogs went at each other's throats one last time, and when Zebro broke free, his snout and face were completely covered in blood," McCoy explained. "That's when—and I'll never forget this for the rest of my life—Mike looked at us, smiled, and said, 'But it wasn't Zebro's blood. It was Maniac's. Now let's go out there and have some fun!'"

"Jesus Christ," McCoy added.

Teammates said Vick continued to reference the story throughout the game as a motivational tool, at one point shouting, "Remember Zebro!" when the team faced a difficult third-down situation.

In addition, as Vick finally entered the game to a loud ovation, his teammates said they were further disturbed when Vick compared them to his dogfighting crew, the "Bad Newz Kennels." Vick said the group would do anything for each other, especially when it came to the mass execution of dogs who failed to win the multimillionaire $1,000 in illegal prize money.

Vick then broke the huddle by loudly barking three times.

"The only reason the Chiefs scored in the second half was because I was still thinking about what Mike said during halftime about 'trunking,'" said linebacker Omar Gaither, referring to the practice of putting two pit bulls in a car trunk, closing the door, and allowing them to fight for 15 minutes until one is dead. "Why is this freak on my team? Why are people cheering for him? Seriously, answer my questions. Why?"

Nike : "We like Vick"

Nike believes Vick should get freebies. I emailed them, asking them why. They said:
Response to your email: (Jeff) - 10/01/2009 09:21 AM   
Thank you for your email. Nike does not have a contractual relationship with
Michael Vick. We have agreed to supply product to Michael Vick as we do a
number of athletes who are not under contract with Nike.
According to Yahoo Sports:

Nike says it does not have a “contractual relationship” with Michael Vick(notes), a day after the quarterback’s agent announced a deal with the manufacturer.

In a statement released Thursday morning, Nike says it has “agreed to supply product to Michael Vick as we do a number of athletes who are not under contract with Nike.”

On Wednesday, Michael Principe, the managing director of BEST, the agency that represents Vick, announced the Philadelphia Eagles player had a new deal with Nike during a panel discussion at the Sports Sponsorship Symposium.

Vick’s agent, Joel Segal, did not immediately return a call for comment Thursday.

Nike, which signed Vick as a rookie in 2001, terminated his contract in August 2007 after he filed a plea agreement admitting his involvement in a dogfighting ring.


Submit your comments to Nike via email here.

Always learning..

“In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on.” ―Robert Frost


Last night I watched my three dogs sleep, and I realized all of the things we get hung up on - all of the things we miss - all of the things we think really matter that do not as time passes - all of the things you wish you could change - all of the things you wish you knew - these things are nothing compared to embracing the life you've been given while you can.
These dogs are home, they know it, they love it, and they helped me relax after two giant cups of bad coffee and 3 hours of a ridiculous class. I love my dogs.




Monday, September 28, 2009

Pals

Sunday, September 27, 2009

We're F***ed

So, I'm not as well versed in herpetology as I'd like to be.... what the heck is this thing? And what does it mean?!


Snake with foot found in China

A snake with a single clawed foot has been discovered in China, according to reports.


Snake that grew a foot out of its body: Snake with foot found in China
Snake that grew a foot out of its body Photo: CEN/Europics

Dean Qiongxiu, 66, said she discovered the reptile clinging to the wall of her bedroom with its talons in the middle of the night.

"I woke up and heard a strange scratching sound. I turned on the light and saw this monster working its way along the wall using his claw," said Mrs Duan of Suining, southwest China.

Mrs Duan said she was so scared she grabbed a shoe and beat the snake to death before preserving its body in a bottle of alcohol.

The snake – 16 inches long and the thickness of a little finger – is now being studied at the Life Sciences Department at China's West Normal University in Nanchang.

Snake expert Long Shuai said: "It is truly shocking but we won't know the cause until we've conducted an autopsy."

A more common mutation among snakes is the growth of a second head, which occurs in a similar way to the formation of Siamese twins in humans.

Such animals are often caught and preserved as lucky tokens but have very little chance of surviving in the wild anyway, especially as the heads have a tendency to attack each other.

How is he still on TV?

This was written over 3 years ago - and yet I'm still having the same discussions with 'admirers' today. WTF?

...Mr. Millan brings his pastiche of animal behaviorism and pop psychology into millions of homes a week. He’s a charming, one-man wrecking ball directed at 40 years of progress in understanding and shaping dog behavior and in developing nonpunitive, reward-based training programs, which have led to seeing each dog as an individual, to understand what motivates it, what frightens it and what its talents and limitations are. Building on strengths and working around and through weaknesses, these trainers and specialists in animal behavior often work wonders with their dogs, but it takes time... Read more from "Pack of Lies"

Recession 101 | Canine Economy

A thought crossed my mind today when I saw someone asking about finding a reputable breeder for a shiba inu puppy.

It is September 27, 2009 and we all know we are flirting with another depression.

Dogs - purebred & marvelous mutts - are being surrendered every moment all across the US because people are losing their homes and/or livelihoods.

And I'm sure there are statistics to show that every moment another puppy is born in the US, just as every moment $$$'s are spent on purebred pups from a variety of sources (from horrid pet stores to reputable breeders)...

All this while rescues may have to cease operations due to lack of funding and adoption.

In a recession/downturn economy - ethically - shouldn't we as a humane nation look to housing and caring for those who need it now?



Consider Rescue. Look locally where a local food pantry may be running dry. Give time if you do not have the financial resources to places like animal shelters or soup kitchens.
Recession 101 : Give what you can.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Getting to know you

Tsuki & Maisy (and Kitsu, really) are still in their integrative "getting to know you" phase - and its going much more smoothly than most! I'm just watching, listening, waiting... learning.

It's cute to watch them figure one another out in their 'prey-play'


What happens during Euthanasia?

Dr. Nancy Kay, author of Speaking for Spot, describes what happens and why during a euthanasia. Listen here, around minute 18:00.

Discover

I had a great godmother. She told me "discover something new each day". There are some days when I don't even realize the gamut of discovery that I've unearthed... other days are blatantly clear.

My dogs have shown me a lot, I discover something new all the time by just watching. Listening.

Many people, "dog people", would probably be appalled at the manner in which I allow my dogs to live and interact - freely. I allow them to be what they are when they want to be. I watch, I listen, I discover.

Yes, they bark. They yip. They gurgle. They growl. They box. They groom. They argue. They show their teeth. They use their teeth. They lick. They play. They chase. They sleep. They 'cuddle'. They eat. They ignore. They engage. They sort it out.
They show me so much when I do not interrupt and interject.

If I ever sat down and started writing a book, it would be about allowing rescued dogs to be what they are in a multi-dog home without trying to always define and understand it - by letting the part of nature you wanted in your living room be exactly what it is - a dog.

I film a lot of it, so I can rewatch and rediscover what I might have missed while it was happening. Like this moment, when Tsuki had enough of 21lbs of energy crawling under her:



I wonder how many dogs would be less inclined to 'act out' on frustrations from being model canine citizens of obedience and 'pack order' if they were allowed to be what they are freely, without human hands corralling them to appropriateness. How much would their people discover?
It's scary how little we know of things that do not speak the same language as we do.

Go discover something new today.

T Minus 2 months til Xmas Puppy Sales...

....Every retail pet shop I've ever visited (and I've made it a point to visit a great many) has always disputed all the above points. In the face of sniffles and severe congenital ailments alike, pet shops have patently denied the defects, pointed to certificates, cited "championship bloodlines" and —— most egregiously —— often ignored my requests that they water their "widgets."

Don't believe me? Check one out for yourself. And beware the following tall tales many pet stores will tell when selling you on their products:

1. "Puppy mills? No way! Our pups come from responsible breeders."

I've never met a pet shop that copped to the truth of the matter. Because puppy mills are breeders, this particular untruth is a sin of omission — until you factor in the word "responsible."

2. "Our pets are sourced from USDA licensed breeders."

This is another obfuscation — not quite a lie. That's because the pets often do come from USDA-certified breeders. But that means just about nothing, given the spotty enforcement of the certification's provisions. In fact, USDA is usually industry code for "puppy mill." After all, who goes out of their way to certify their pet-friendly establishment as an agriculture-based endeavor?

3. "Your pet comes with a certificate of good health."

Most states require that each puppy sold be accompanied by an Official Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (OCVI). But most veterinarians will tell you this paperwork has nothing to do with health, per se. It's just about vaccines, drugs and intestinal parasite exams, no more. For example, freedom from congenital deformities and other obvious diseases are not required for OCVI "health certification."

4. "You should use our veterinarian because she's the best!"

Veterinarians who work with pet stores are often rewarded for overlooking major abnormalities. That's usually how they get the job to begin with. Many are willing to examine 40 pups an hour and issue "health certificates" for all. They'll also work happily with pet stores because they know the first "free" exam they offer buyers means another new client.

5. "If your pet gets sick in the first X number of days, you have to see our vet or we can't reimburse you."

Pet stores want you to use their preferred vets during this period because these professionals will charge far less if they know their pet store partners are on the hook for the bill. It usually means said vets are less likely to treat your new pet aggressively and/or appropriately. It's also the case that most pet stores won't willingly disclose the presence of "lemon laws" in states where these consumer protections have been legislated. These laws will often require that pet stores reimburse consumers for reasonable veterinary expenses and always allow independent veterinarians access.....

Read the entire Dr. Khuly article here.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Thanks, babe.

I know he doesn't read this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.

I have to give a huge shout out to my husband. He rocks, truly. He washes the dishes, walks Maisy at 10pm and 5am, picks up poop on our walks, and beyond all of that is such a partner for me in this life. I love my dogs, but man do I love my husband even more when I watch him interact with them. We are a family. And John - you are perfect.




(totally cheesy, but while i was writing this I totally was listening to Michelle Featherstone's song "We are Man & Wife"...)

Dog Fighting - WHYY?

Fresh Air interviews John Goodwin and Sean Moore about Dog Fighting.

Best part, Sean Moore says "If the police ain't arresting ya, then it ain't wrong, right?"

To which the interviewer asks "Pit bulls are loyal dogs... pet owners understand and get emotional about that loyalty and return it. Didn't you ever feel that for your dogs?"

Sean Moore says yeah, and it made him sad that he fought his dog under peer pressure, to which his dog sustained a mortal wound. So Sean shot his dog. Dead.

No. I can't imagine that anyone that would willingly put their dogs' in harms way feel any sort of emotional bond with that dog. How could they? Money is too enticing.

But then he (moore) says that pits are the most loving of dogs, unless they fall into the wrong hands. He owns three dogs now.


Click here to listen.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

BSL targets mixes, too

It’s something you never have to think about, until you move to a pit bull banned area where suddenly you’re faced with the prospect of your dog’s resemblance to this "evil" breed.

It’s a big problem here in Miami. Plenty of my new clients––relocated for work, school, family proximity, etc.––find their dogs the target of one the most backward laws on the books anywhere.

So you know, it’s not just pit bulls who come up against the ban here in Miami-Dade County. It’s any dog that even modestly resembles a pit. Here, any dog determined to be even 1/4 pit bull gets the axe––unless the dog is moved outside the county line.

So who decides whether a dog is a pit bull or not? Well, that’s an interesting question, isn’t it? Here in Miami the decision lies in the hands of the one Animal Services employee we call the "pit bull czar." If in his "expert" opinion the dog is significantly pitty, the dog is automatically treated to a "three strikes you’re out" procedure.

First it’s a $500 fine, then a $1,000 fine. After that it’s light’s out––as in, euthanasia.

But when it comes right down to it, this is an extremely arbitrary decision making process. I’ve seen a small, Boston terrier mix flagged as a pit. I’ve seen an American bulldog cited because the owners could not produce registration paperwork (who saves that stuff?)...and the czar called it a pit mix.

Ultimately, the problem is that all pit bull bans are extremely difficult to enforce fairly. One city in Kansas recently learned this the hard way. When the city of Salinas cited Lucey the terrier mix, her owner decided to appeal the pit bull designation. Using a DNA test marketed to determine mixed breed provenance (we’ve talked about this before on DailyVet), Lucey was found to have only 12 percent Staffordshire terrier (a pit bull marker) within her DNA.

Saved!

Though I’d love to offer you Lucey’s tale of success as a great news story, it’s my take that this happy event only serves to underscore the ridiculousness of these bans. If cities must adopt a notoriously inaccurate test like this one to protect its citizens from the law, what does that say about these breed bans? They’re every bit as fickle and feckless.

Not only is the thinking behind the bans flawed, the outcome of these laws is proof enough of their idiocy. Banning pit bulls has not reduced dog-related violence in areas that have adopted them. Those who keep pit bulls cruelly and irresponsibly will forever fly below the radar, while those of us who would keep them (and their mixes) as beloved pets are the ones whose dogs ultimately pay the price.

Dr. Patty Khuly (click here for PetMD article)

Whip it good.

So, you take a terrier & mix it with a greyhound to get a Whippet.

Awesome.

Then you add more terrier, and maybe some hound, to get CRAZY MAISY.

Fantastic.


We are buying a Doggie DNA test today and will report the results in a few weeks!

Monday, September 21, 2009

My Dog is Family [photo contest]

Your entry benefits Bad Rap! There is no downside! Click here

Our entry:
From Tsuki, Kitsu & Maisy - Fall 09