Google "bull lurcher" - nearly all of them resemble Maisy in some way. Fascinating.
for your comparison - click here.



The 'sighthound build'
lessons learned from life with inus



In searching for the right dog, we encourage you to look beyond a breed to consider the dog himself. Personality is the most important indicator of what it will be like to live with a dog, and a mutt has it in spades. (love it!)

An official said at least 20 carcasses were dug up Saturday from the backyard of a Selden woman who was charged with animal cruelty after her pets were seized by the SPCA.
In an eerie scene, SPCA detectives working in a floodlit yard last night dug up one reeking black plastic garbage bag after another, the contents unrecognizable. At times, the smell was overpowering... Of one carcass that was found, Gross said, "There is suspected foul play with this animal." He encouraged anyone with information to call the SPCA at 631-382-7722 and said calls would be kept confidential.
Sharon McDonough, 43, was arrested Saturday and charged with a misdemeanor count of animal cruelty after five dogs were found in the house Thursday in feces, housed in small cages with no food or water, Gross said. A cat, bird and hamster were also taken from the house, Gross said.
McDonough lives in the home with her seven children, who range in age from 18 months to 21, neighbors said.
Authorities went to the home after complaints from neighbors and the animal rescue group Rescue Ink.
Prosecutors were investigating allegations that neighborhood pets were buried in McDonough's backyard, Suffolk district attorney spokesman Bob Clifford said Friday. SPCA investigators obtained a search warrant to dig.
It was unclear last night whether the SPCA would continue to dig in the yard...



—Jonathan Safran Foer is the author of the novels "Everything is Illuminated" and "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close." His new book, "Eating Animals," a work of nonfiction, comes out next week.
...Dogs are wonderful, and in many ways unique. But they are remarkably unremarkable in their intellectual and experiential capacities. Pigs are every bit as intelligent and feeling, by any sensible definition of the words. They can't hop into the back of a Volvo, but they can fetch, run and play, be mischievous and reciprocate affection. So why don't they get to curl up by the fire? Why can't they at least be spared being tossed on the fire? Our taboo against dog eating says something about dogs and a great deal about us.The French, who love their dogs, sometimes eat their horses.
The Spanish, who love their horses, sometimes eat their cows.
The Indians, who love their cows, sometimes eat their dogs.
While written in a much different context, George Orwell's words (from "Animal Farm") apply here: "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
So who's right? What might be the reasons to exclude canine from the menu? The selective carnivore suggests:
Don't eat companion animals. But dogs aren't kept as companions in all of the places they are eaten. And what about our petless neighbors? Would we have any right to object if they had dog for dinner?
OK, then: Don't eat animals with significant mental capacities. If by "significant mental capacities" we mean what a dog has, then good for the dog. But such a definition would also include the pig, cow and chicken. And it would exclude severely impaired humans.
Then: It's for good reason that the eternal taboos—don't fiddle with your crap, kiss your sister, or eat your companions—are taboo. Evolutionarily speaking, those things are bad for us. But dog eating isn't a taboo in many places, and it isn't in any way bad for us. Properly cooked, dog meat poses no greater health risks than any other meat.
...
Of course, something having been done just about everywhere is no kind of justification for doing it now. But unlike all farmed meat, which requires the creation and maintenance of animals, dogs are practically begging to be eaten. Three to four million dogs and cats are euthanized annually. The simple disposal of these euthanized dogs is an enormous ecological and economic problem. But eating those strays, those runaways, those not-quite-cute-enough-to-take and not-quite-well-behaved-enough-to-keep dogs would be killing a flock of birds with one stone and eating it, too.
In a sense it's what we're doing already. Rendering—the conversion of animal protein unfit for human consumption into food for livestock and pets—allows processing plants to transform useless dead dogs into productive members of the food chain. In America, millions of dogs and cats euthanized in animal shelters every year become the food for our food. So let's just eliminate this inefficient and bizarre middle step.
This need not challenge our civility. We won't make them suffer any more than necessary. While it's widely believed that adrenaline makes dog meat taste better—hence the traditional methods of slaughter: hanging, boiling alive, beating to death—we can all agree that if we're going to eat them, we should kill them quickly and painlessly, right? For example, the traditional Hawaiian means of holding the dog's nose shut—in order to conserve blood—must be regarded (socially if not legally) as a no-no. Perhaps we could include dogs under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. That doesn't say anything about how they're treated during their lives, and isn't subject to any meaningful oversight or enforcement, but surely we can rely on the industry to "self-regulate," as we do with other eaten animals.
...Food is not rational. Food is culture, habit, craving and identity. Responding to factory farming calls for a capacity to care that dwells beyond information. We know what we see on undercover videos of factory farms and slaughterhouses is wrong. (There are those who will defend a system that allows for occasional animal cruelty, but no one defends the cruelty, itself.) And despite it being entirely reasonable, the case for eating dogs is likely repulsive to just about every reader of this paper. The instinct comes before our reason, and is more important.

The behavior is all we’re really trying to adjust. When you’re done, you have the same trigger as before, and the same consequence, but a new behavior. The core idea that I love from CAT is the idea of using the reward that the dog is already getting to reward a new, better behavior.So if the dog is already getting paid for barking at the mailman by having him leave, the new set-up is to pay the dog for calm behavior by having a pseudo-mailman leave as a consequence for good behavior.
With the Antecedent -> Behavior -> Consequence model, you have something like:
Antecedent -> Behavior 1 -> Consequence
being replaced by
Antecedent -> Behavior 2 -> Consequence(Think of ‘antecedent’ as a cue or something that signals the behavior is about to be paid for.)
So
Mailman arrives -> Barking -> Mailman leaves
is replaced by
Mailman arrives -> dog turns away -> Mailman leavesI love that part. It means that the environment itself, which created the problem, will now start rewarding your dog. You will need to have several friends practice being the mailman before it works for real.
The bigger picture of BAT is that it includes real-world positive reinforcement, too:
Mom comes home -> jumping -> petting/attention
is replaced by
Mom comes home -> sitting -> petting/attention
In the CAT procedure we use the reinforcer the dog is already working for. We are listening him by observing the outcome he gets from his aggressive behavior. It is usually distance from aversive stimuli. In our treatment we provide the outcome he wants only when he behaves in safe, friendly ways. This means his needs are still being met, but they aren't putting the lives of others or his own life at risk any more.
But a funny thing happens in the treatment. He learns to like other people and dogs.
Our experimental question asked whether aggression could be reduced by the contingent withdrawal of an aversive stimulus, introduced at low intensities. We found out more than our questions asked... that we not only ended up with dogs that tolerated the strangers they were once aggressive toward, but we ended up with the dogs being friendly toward the strangers. (This has been successfully replicated with feral cats, too.)
The way we determine how the dog views the procedure is that at the end of the procedure the dog is soliciting interaction from the formerly aversive stimulus whereas previously he was attacking it. He is not just ignoring the stimulus or turning to his owner in its presence, either, he's just not worried about it any more. For some dogs who are more stoic in their general demeanor and aren't goofily friendly in the first place, these dogs often just start hanging out with the other dog without attacking or withdrawing... they just start treating them in a way that is accepting.
One reason we use negative reinforcement -- probably the most important, is that the dogs have to learn to deal with aversive stimuli that trigger aggression, or else they will have a truncated or restricted life, or a life of fear and defensiveness. We want them to learn that the world isn't such a bad place and that there are other ways to deal with new people/animals that are easier, more effective and produce better results.
By training aggressive dogs to be "not aggressive" by giving them food or other positive reinforcers, we introduce an arbitrary reinforcer that doesn't help them deal with the actual problem of being concerned about strangers. In theory it sounds good--teach them to defer to the owner-- but what if you could teach the dog that he doesn't have to turn away from fearsome stimuli and hope his owner is on the ball, but instead simply not be afraid of the stimuli any more?
That's what we've managed to accomplish through negative reinforcement combined with an errorless learning (below threshold) procedure that we haven't seen accomplished with positive reinforcement. This is the difference between treating a behavior functionally (providing the reinforcer the animal is already working for, but providing it contingently upon safe, friendly behaviors (as part of a shaping process) rather than the way he is currently earning the outcome- through aggression.
By the end we have a decoy that is now a conditioned reinforcer... and thus no longer aversive.
MASHPEE — There was a collective sigh of relief among dog owners at Mashpee High School last night after residents resoundingly voted down a proposed pit bull bylaw at the annual fall town meeting.
The proposed bylaw would have prohibited residents from owning more than one of the dogs, would have made it mandatory that the dogs be spayed or neutered, forced owners to get expensive liability insurance, and placed the responsibility on the owners of mixed breeds to prove that their dog is not a pit bull through DNA testing, among other restrictions.
The article was placed on the warrant by petition and lacked the support of the finance committee and selectmen.
In the end, it was defeated by a deafening voice vote after 239 registered voters sped through budget adjustments and changes to the town's zoning code.
Those against the bylaw turned out in force, far outnumbering those who were for it, with some nonresidents coming from as far as Plymouth to speak to the merits of the dogs.
"I'm very happy," Mashpee resident Michelle Storm said after the vote, as dog lovers petted her 3-year-old female pit bull and service dog Bugsy. "This is a big relief off of my chest. We have another (pit bull) and I medically need (Bugsy). I don't know what I would do if one of them was taken away."
The warrant article made waves in recent weeks as residents and animal activists challenged the legality and restrictiveness of the proposed bylaw's language.
The article was added by petition after Ashumet Road residents Carmen and Melissa Shay, who have two young girls, tried unsuccessfully to prevent a neighbor from moving next door with six of the dogs.
The proposal, which was modeled after a bylaw already in place in Canton, gave animal control officers the power to impound and even euthanize dogs whose owners were not in compliance or suspected of not being in compliance.
The Canton bylaw has yet to be challenged in court.
...Half an hour into the raid, reports began to come in. The good news: The dogs were still there; news of the raid hadn't leaked. The bad news: There weren't 60 dogs, as anticipated; there were more. The final count was 97.Most of the dogs were pit bull terriers; many were puppies. They were found cowering in cages or chained. Some older dogs were scarred -- possible signs of fighting, investigators said. Others were malnourished, simply skin and bone.
Their conditions were atrocious, according to Terry Wolf of the Dublin-Laurens County Humane Society.
"Their chains are too short to reach shelter, those who have shelter. The water that they have seems to be recent rainwater with algae in it, and I've seen no food bowls. Most of them are very timid," Wolf said. "They seem to be human-friendly, but they're attention starved, and they're definitely not socialized. You can tell they've been living hidden in the woods, out of sight."
...Several hours into the raid, the first group of dogs was transported from the woods to an undisclosed location. A CNN crew was allowed to go but could shoot only from inside this building.
Investigators feared that if there were any identifiable marks outside the property, someone might recognize it and steal the dogs. Authorities couldn't take that chance. But they did allow video of some of the dogs from inside the cages. They had taken many puppies, which looked helpless.
Volunteers feared one puppy wouldn't make it through the night.
The next step for these dogs is to determine which ones are healthy enough to possibly be adopted. Some, sadly, won't share that fate. They'll have to be put down.
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE A DOG FROM EACH CKC/AKC “GROUP,” WHAT WOULD YOU CHOOSE AND WHY?
(excluding your own breeds)
Group 1- Sporting Group 2- Hound Group 3- Working Group 4- Terriers Group 5- Toys Group 6- Non Sporting Group 7- Herding Group 8 - Misc.
- - - - - - - - - -
Sporting:
I never saw myself with any of the bird/gun dog types that tend to be considered "sporting" but I think if I had the time, resources and purpose for such a dog - there are three I would highly consider.
First, the Spinone Italiano. It has a very griffon-esq look to it that I really like. It is said to need extra socialization as it is naturally cautious, not unlike my shibas, and happy with its family.
Second and third would be the German Shorthaired Pointer (my neighbor has the perfect GSP!), and the Vizsla, however, as stated above if I couldn't provide a natural outlet for their working purpose, I don't think I could ever keep with with their energy requirements! Maisy taught me to be cautionary with this detail... hunting dogs NEED a proper outlet, daily.
Hound:
I lived with a basset hound for about 8 months until he was adopted, and I loved that dog. Loved. I think based on my
experience with him, I would love to experience the Petite Basset Griffon (love that look!) Vendeen. Second to the PBGV would be the Plott Hound. It has always intrigued me as a generally untapped breed of sorts, still with its high, aggressive hunting drive intact and a beautifully designed "woodsie" brindle coat. And Basenji's are a close second, but having Shibas is enough for me :)
Working:
Here's a fun catagory. Are these dogs truly bred for work? If so, a Rottweiler please! I have not met a single rottweiler that I didn't immediately want to kiss, and yet, through all the devotion they have for their families, there are still strains of them bred for work - be it protection or farm (herding) work - these dogs are built for just about any job.. I like that about a dog.
Terrier:
For no other reason than I like the "sound" of them, Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
"The Staffordshire Bull Terrier is extremely courageous and obedient, highly intelligent and affectionate with a sense of humor. This, coupled with its affection for
its friends, and children in particular, its off-duty quietness and trustworthy stability, makes it a foremost all-purpose dog. He looks forward to daily exercise, and his powerful jaws enj
oy a supply of sturdy chew toys. While he is a sweet-tempered, affectionate dog, his strength and determination require an experienced owner who can work with him in a firm, but gentle way."
Toy:
I can't really pick any that I'd honestly WANT to own, like for 12+ years. I like the idea of owning a pug - but we walk a lot in all weather. And I now would consider the Italian Greyhound, only having found out a lot about them after Maisy's DNA test indicated traces of them. However, even then, I don't think they would fit into our lifestyle except when we settle in to watch a movie or something.
Non-Sporting:
The non-sporting group are all dogs of a certain function that aren't recognized or utilized much in the US.
I would have trouble picking any of them (including the shiba inu)
only because I think the direction of breeding taken with all of them leaves a hella lot to be desired. They seem to be selected more for type in this category than for purpose or health. Perhaps for companion purposes only, the Tibetan Terrier is interesting enough.
Herding:
Only, and if only, I had the proper task for the dog : A Beauceron. It is beautiful, and rich in French history - The earliest record found so far of what is thought to be the Beauceron dates back to a Renaissance manuscript of 1578. In 1809, the abbey Rozier reported plain dogs guarding flocks and herds. In 1863, Pierre Megnin differentiated, with precision, two types of these sheep dogs: one with a long coat, which became known as the Berger de Brie (Briard), the other with a short coat, which is known as the Berger de Beauce (Beauceron). Second to that would be the Canaan dog, because they remind me of the version of a spitz that I long ago would have considered 'ideal'.
Miscellaneous:
This is an interesting group. As it stands now, I'm not sure I would choose any of these breeds to own.. for any purpose. But for posts sake, I'll say Norwegian Lundehund because of its ability to climb rocks to get the puffins and therefore has a fun "toe requirement" in its standard.
With their eyes, wallets and hearts open, the Eagles last August volunteered for a franchise-defining choice. Michael Vick was available, and once everyone realized that they could make the money work, this was the simple either-or:...
Choose to reject Vick’s application on safe public-relations grounds. Or sign him and use him --- in the wildcat formation, as a holder, on special teams, in trick plays and maybe even as a change-of-pace quarterback on a day when nothing else is working.
There didn’t seem to be a losing side of that decision ... until now. Because it’s apparent that Eagles are shoving themselves into the worst of both positions.
That’s what happened Sunday, early and late. On their way into the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, the Eagles were forced to pass the now-obligatory bands of protesters, still upset that Vick is in the NFL despite his prominent role in a dog-fighting circuit. And on their way out, they were 13-9 losers to the Oakland Raiders, one of those NFL teams believed to be inept --- that after Vick was on the field for one play, a four-yard rushing loss.
Research in the fields of genetics, immunology, and veterinary medicine, is turning up more and more information indicating that high levels of inbreeding can have deleterious effects on health. Inbreeding depression, a complex of behavioral and physical reproductive problems, have long been recognized. Inbreeding can increase the frequency of a disease in a population, sometimes quite rapidly. Inbreeding leads to increased incidence of immune-mediated disease and cancer. (From Playing COI)
![]() |
| From Crazy Maisy! |
The Eagles are also announcing the Eagles TAWK series, a public service campaign and a dedicated Web site.
1. TAWK Series – The TAWK Series will bring animal experts to local elementary and middle schools to educate students on responsible pet care and the amazing abilities that dogs have as working and service animals.
2. Public Service Campaign – In collaboration with the animal advocacy community, the public service campaign will involve Eagles players and will educate the public on critical animal welfare issues and inspire action among target audiences.
3. TAWK Web site – An educational website about the TAWK program will be available through the PhiladephiaEagles.com webpage. The website includes not only information and updates about the TAWK program, but detailed facts about animal welfare issues as well. The website will be used to link our fans with animal organizations throughout the area.
4. Promotional Executions – The Eagles will develop and execute comprehensive media strategies to promote TAWK and other related causes. Promotional outlets including Eagles Television Network produced shows such as the Donovan McNabb Show, the Andy Reid Show and the Eagles Kid's Club Show will be included.
5. Organizational collaboration – The Eagles will support animal welfare organizations in their fundraising and awareness programs by committing various Eagles personnel and resources to expand their efforts.
My name is Calah Kulm and I am a local agent for Farmers Insurance in Spokane, WA. As many of you have probably heard, Farmers is now insuring homes that have ANY type of dog breed. There is no official announcement per se but all states have recently changed their underwriting guidelines to not discriminate against breeds. If your agent is uncertain, simply have him/her call their underwriting department to ask about it. Also, please call me with any questions and/or concerns and particularly if you live within my area and would like to meet with me! I look forward to helping you all and again, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
Calah Kulm
Farmers Insurance
41 W. Riverside Ste 220
Spokane, WA 99201
Bus: (509) 270-2898
ckulm@farmersagent.com







The owner of a northwest Houston home where more than 1,000 animals were seized after being found in deplorable conditions agreed to surrender the animals to the Houston SPCA and will forfeit his residence to Harris County to pay for their medical and boarding costs, based on an agreement reached in court Wednesday...
...Boado, who had been keeping the animals to sell at flea markets, declined to comment as he left court with his attorneys and his brother Wednesday. But Harris County Attorney Vince Ryan said the agreement was a good outcome for what he described as one of the largest animal seizures in U.S. history...
...Boado's attorney, Brian Storts, said his client recognizes some responsibility for his actions and described him as an “honest, law-abiding citizen” who agreed to the forfeiture because it was in his best interest.
“It certainly sets a precedent and makes an example of the importance of these kinds of laws,” Storts said.
“He certainly did not intend for those animals to be mistreated and worked hard at being able to treat them properly,” Storts said. “The credibility of his business was in being able to provide healthy animals. Unfortunately, not much different than a grocery store, you have a certain amount of spoilage, and that's a whole lot of what we're faced with here.”
...[Houston SPCA] raided Boado's property Sept. 23 and found 1,009 animals in filthy conditions, most crammed into tight cages, many without basic necessities such as food and water. Both live and dead animals were found caged.Officers found birds with broken legs, a German shepherd and a goat that were extremely emaciated and a live duck infested with maggots, court documents show. Numerous blind rodents were on the property.
Ducks and geese were drinking from puddles that had dead chickens in them, and one trailer was filled with caged animals kept in the dark with no food, water or heat, a county attorney's office report shows. Some of the mice had cannibalized each other, said county attorney's office spokeswoman Ella Tyler.
Officers seized three dogs, numerous ducks and chickens, 100 parakeets and parrots, and numerous iguanas, hamsters and rats. The property was riddled with equipment and trash, photographs show. In all, 100 to 200 of the animals have died, said Assistant County Attorney Linda Geffin.
Can we even fathom that many animals? Dead? Spoilage...





Breeds of cur are usually not recognized by major show registries, and selection for certain looks has never been a real factor in their development. They were selected mainly for hunting or work ability, although some breeds of cur are also known for herding ability. As a result, in most of the cur breeds the appearance standard is extremely flexible, enough so that a complete breed appearance standard is difficult to create. The resultant diversity in appearance and selection for physical ability result in breeds that tend to be genetically sound and healthy.


The strongest, fittest hares survived to breed and further enhance the species. The weaker specimens maybe wouldn't.
To my mind this makes coursing preferable to shooting which is unselective. I could never bring myself to shoot a hare for this amazing mammal was born to run.


PHILADELPHIA—Michael Vick's pregame pep talk Sunday, in which he recounted the events of a brutal 2004 dogfight between his pit bull terrier Zebro and rival pit bull Maniac, failed to inspire his teammates in any way whatsoever, Eagles team sources reported.
Vick, who was playing in his first NFL game since serving an 18-month prison sentence, called the 10-minute story "really motivational," and reportedly failed to understand why his graphic recounting of how Zebro ripped out Maniac's larynx caused teammates to stagger out of the player tunnel and onto Lincoln Financial Field with their heads hanging.
"I don't know what their problem is, because that story pumps me up every time," Vick said during a postgame press conference. "It's a classic underdog story: On one side of the dogfighting pit you had Maniac, who was a beast, and on my end you had Zebro, who was pretty good, but not great. Yet we had trained him hard. We strengthened his hind legs by forcing him to constantly jump at a teasing stick; we emotionally tortured him so that he would attack everything in sight; and from the time he was a little puppy, we toughened him up by beating him with a metal baton."
"I told my teammates that the stakes were high, because if Zebro had lost, I would have either electrocuted him, drowned him, or slammed his body to the ground until he was dead," Vick added. "How is that not inspiring?"
According to Eagles players, Vick's voice increased in intensity at key moments throughout the pep talk, and he was at his most impassioned when he spoke of how Zebro continued to fight despite the fact that numerous chunks of flesh had been ripped from his body.
Vick also sought to motivate his team by comparing the Eagles' weekly preparation to Zebro's, saying that just as Vick had forced his pit bull to drag a tire with his mouth for hours on end to strengthen his jaw, the Eagles defense had put in the training necessary to stop quarterback Matt Cassel.
Sources confirmed that by the end of the locker room speech, the Eagles were so demoralized they could barely muster the will to put their hands into the team circle for a group cheer.
"I don't know why he told us those things," said Eagles quarterback Kevin Kolb, visibly disturbed as he told reporters that Vick looked proud when he explained how Zebro nearly lost consciousness several times throughout the fight. "I spent the first half of the game trying to get all that imagery out of my head: the bloody pit, the cigar smoke, grown men shouting as dogs ripped each other to shreds. It was so messed up that it didn't even sound real."
"They turned those dogs into monsters and made them kill each other for their own sick enjoyment," Kolb added. "For their own fucking enjoyment."
Running back LeSean McCoy echoed Kolb, saying that at no time during the game did he draw on the thought of Zebro losing half his ear as a source of inspiration.
"Before we went out on the field, [Vick] told us how the dogs went at each other's throats one last time, and when Zebro broke free, his snout and face were completely covered in blood," McCoy explained. "That's when—and I'll never forget this for the rest of my life—Mike looked at us, smiled, and said, 'But it wasn't Zebro's blood. It was Maniac's. Now let's go out there and have some fun!'"
"Jesus Christ," McCoy added.
Teammates said Vick continued to reference the story throughout the game as a motivational tool, at one point shouting, "Remember Zebro!" when the team faced a difficult third-down situation.
In addition, as Vick finally entered the game to a loud ovation, his teammates said they were further disturbed when Vick compared them to his dogfighting crew, the "Bad Newz Kennels." Vick said the group would do anything for each other, especially when it came to the mass execution of dogs who failed to win the multimillionaire $1,000 in illegal prize money.
Vick then broke the huddle by loudly barking three times.
"The only reason the Chiefs scored in the second half was because I was still thinking about what Mike said during halftime about 'trunking,'" said linebacker Omar Gaither, referring to the practice of putting two pit bulls in a car trunk, closing the door, and allowing them to fight for 15 minutes until one is dead. "Why is this freak on my team? Why are people cheering for him? Seriously, answer my questions. Why?"
Response to your email: (Jeff) - 10/01/2009 09:21 AMAccording to Yahoo Sports:
Thank you for your email. Nike does not have a contractual relationship with
Michael Vick. We have agreed to supply product to Michael Vick as we do a
number of athletes who are not under contract with Nike.
In a statement released Thursday morning, Nike says it has “agreed to supply product to Michael Vick as we do a number of athletes who are not under contract with Nike.”
On Wednesday, Michael Principe, the managing director of BEST, the agency that represents Vick, announced the Philadelphia Eagles player had a new deal with Nike during a panel discussion at the Sports Sponsorship Symposium.
Vick’s agent, Joel Segal, did not immediately return a call for comment Thursday.
Nike, which signed Vick as a rookie in 2001, terminated his contract in August 2007 after he filed a plea agreement admitting his involvement in a dogfighting ring.
Dean Qiongxiu, 66, said she discovered the reptile clinging to the wall of her bedroom with its talons in the middle of the night.
"I woke up and heard a strange scratching sound. I turned on the light and saw this monster working its way along the wall using his claw," said Mrs Duan of Suining, southwest China.
Mrs Duan said she was so scared she grabbed a shoe and beat the snake to death before preserving its body in a bottle of alcohol.
The snake – 16 inches long and the thickness of a little finger – is now being studied at the Life Sciences Department at China's West Normal University in Nanchang.
Snake expert Long Shuai said: "It is truly shocking but we won't know the cause until we've conducted an autopsy."
A more common mutation among snakes is the growth of a second head, which occurs in a similar way to the formation of Siamese twins in humans.
Such animals are often caught and preserved as lucky tokens but have very little chance of surviving in the wild anyway, especially as the heads have a tendency to attack each other.
...Mr. Millan brings his pastiche of animal behaviorism and pop psychology into millions of homes a week. He’s a charming, one-man wrecking ball directed at 40 years of progress in understanding and shaping dog behavior and in developing nonpunitive, reward-based training programs, which have led to seeing each dog as an individual, to understand what motivates it, what frightens it and what its talents and limitations are. Building on strengths and working around and through weaknesses, these trainers and specialists in animal behavior often work wonders with their dogs, but it takes time... Read more from "Pack of Lies"
Don't believe me? Check one out for yourself. And beware the following tall tales many pet stores will tell when selling you on their products:
1. "Puppy mills? No way! Our pups come from responsible breeders."
I've never met a pet shop that copped to the truth of the matter. Because puppy mills are breeders, this particular untruth is a sin of omission — until you factor in the word "responsible."
2. "Our pets are sourced from USDA licensed breeders."
This is another obfuscation — not quite a lie. That's because the pets often do come from USDA-certified breeders. But that means just about nothing, given the spotty enforcement of the certification's provisions. In fact, USDA is usually industry code for "puppy mill." After all, who goes out of their way to certify their pet-friendly establishment as an agriculture-based endeavor?
3. "Your pet comes with a certificate of good health."
Most states require that each puppy sold be accompanied by an Official Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (OCVI). But most veterinarians will tell you this paperwork has nothing to do with health, per se. It's just about vaccines, drugs and intestinal parasite exams, no more. For example, freedom from congenital deformities and other obvious diseases are not required for OCVI "health certification."
4. "You should use our veterinarian because she's the best!"
Veterinarians who work with pet stores are often rewarded for overlooking major abnormalities. That's usually how they get the job to begin with. Many are willing to examine 40 pups an hour and issue "health certificates" for all. They'll also work happily with pet stores because they know the first "free" exam they offer buyers means another new client.
5. "If your pet gets sick in the first X number of days, you have to see our vet or we can't reimburse you."
Pet stores want you to use their preferred vets during this period because these professionals will charge far less if they know their pet store partners are on the hook for the bill. It usually means said vets are less likely to treat your new pet aggressively and/or appropriately. It's also the case that most pet stores won't willingly disclose the presence of "lemon laws" in states where these consumer protections have been legislated. These laws will often require that pet stores reimburse consumers for reasonable veterinary expenses and always allow independent veterinarians access.....
It’s a big problem here in Miami. Plenty of my new clients––relocated for work, school, family proximity, etc.––find their dogs the target of one the most backward laws on the books anywhere.
So you know, it’s not just pit bulls who come up against the ban here in Miami-Dade County. It’s any dog that even modestly resembles a pit. Here, any dog determined to be even 1/4 pit bull gets the axe––unless the dog is moved outside the county line.
So who decides whether a dog is a pit bull or not? Well, that’s an interesting question, isn’t it? Here in Miami the decision lies in the hands of the one Animal Services employee we call the "pit bull czar." If in his "expert" opinion the dog is significantly pitty, the dog is automatically treated to a "three strikes you’re out" procedure.
First it’s a $500 fine, then a $1,000 fine. After that it’s light’s out––as in, euthanasia.
But when it comes right down to it, this is an extremely arbitrary decision making process. I’ve seen a small, Boston terrier mix flagged as a pit. I’ve seen an American bulldog cited because the owners could not produce registration paperwork (who saves that stuff?)...and the czar called it a pit mix.
Ultimately, the problem is that all pit bull bans are extremely difficult to enforce fairly. One city in Kansas recently learned this the hard way. When the city of Salinas cited Lucey the terrier mix, her owner decided to appeal the pit bull designation. Using a DNA test marketed to determine mixed breed provenance (we’ve talked about this before on DailyVet), Lucey was found to have only 12 percent Staffordshire terrier (a pit bull marker) within her DNA.
Saved!
Though I’d love to offer you Lucey’s tale of success as a great news story, it’s my take that this happy event only serves to underscore the ridiculousness of these bans. If cities must adopt a notoriously inaccurate test like this one to protect its citizens from the law, what does that say about these breed bans? They’re every bit as fickle and feckless.
Not only is the thinking behind the bans flawed, the outcome of these laws is proof enough of their idiocy. Banning pit bulls has not reduced dog-related violence in areas that have adopted them. Those who keep pit bulls cruelly and irresponsibly will forever fly below the radar, while those of us who would keep them (and their mixes) as beloved pets are the ones whose dogs ultimately pay the price.
![]() |
| From Tsuki, Kitsu & Maisy - Fall 09 |